Poll: Is food better than sex?

Recommended Videos

Paksenarrion

New member
Mar 13, 2009
2,911
0
0
I would say it depends on one's socio-economic status. If you are poor and can't afford cuisine-style food, and in some cases must sell your body just to get food...let's just say that you don't live day by day, wondering when your next sexual fix will come.

If you are rich and dine frequently in other countries just for brunch with various clientele, chances are you might also purchase your..."other" needs. However, an expensive escort does not necessarily mean a wonderful night. Without love, you will forever worry if the other person truly did enjoy it.

If you are middle class...um...WoW, anyone?
 

Redlin5_v1legacy

Better Red than Dead
Aug 5, 2009
48,836
0
0
I hope sex is better[footnote]says the obvious virgin[/footnote] as I have had some pretty bad experiences with food.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Panda Mania said:
food will always exist as a bountiful, delectable resource that gives and gives, and asks nothing in return!
Except your waistline, but exercise will give it back.
 

Nouw

New member
Mar 18, 2009
15,615
0
0
The question is, do you want to live or have intercourse? Remember the thread about Meat or Sex? Meat all the way
 

badvibration

New member
Jan 25, 2010
28
0
0
cyrogeist said:
wait your pretty much much asking living or having fun
Obviously you have never been naked in a vat full of chocolate pudding, one can not even ponder the endless possibilities of fun in that situation.

As the great PurpleLeafRave once said "Well...you can combine food and sex. Whipped cream anyone? Banana split?"
 

IxionIndustries

New member
Mar 18, 2009
2,237
0
0
Darth_Dude said:
j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:
Darth_Dude said:
I need food to survive, so...yes.

Sex is like an added bonus to life, people can live without it.
No they can't. Life begins with sex. Be a damned strange world if people started being born without being concieved first.
Torque669 said:
Darth_Dude said:
I need food to survive, so...yes.

Sex is like an added bonus to life, people can live without it.
The Human race wont continue without it however.
What I'm trying to say is, an average person. as in you or me, can survive without sex.
Yes, but we also die lonely, angry, and possibly by our own hands.
 

Florion

New member
Dec 7, 2008
670
0
0
Conundrum... I don't think I'd be able to enjoy myself on an empty stomach, but sex definitely sounds more exciting - I wouldn't know. xP At least, I don't find food very much so, so it better be more exciting. >_>

Incidentally, I think there happens to be a comedian debate thingy in Canada too, on CBC, but I don't know what it's called or when it happens, although I'm pretty sure it's a weekly thing. Hah? I wish I had a nice radio...
 

Requx

New member
Mar 28, 2010
378
0
0
The question is why not mix the two, Salami sandwich + sex= salami sex awesomeness
 

garfoldsomeoneelse

Charming, But Stupid
Mar 22, 2009
2,908
0
0
Well, more often than not, food is a lot more satisfying. I'm sexually demanding, but my appetite is pretty normal, and as a result, the latter is far easier to perform maintenance on.
 

twaddle

New member
Nov 17, 2009
1,327
0
0
technically u could eat and get your jollies at the same time but i rather not get graphic.....i take that back. u could only survive on liquid like substances for so long. I don't mean human waster u bloody sickos
 

w-Jinksy

New member
May 30, 2009
961
0
0
not to be offensive but the comments saying that we need food to survive so that are probably the people who haven't had sex.

i'd say sex definitely feels better than eating food plus you don't get fat from too much sex in fact the opposite.
 

NickCaligo42

New member
Oct 7, 2007
1,371
0
0
Andronicus said:
You need to be clear. Do you mean if I have to pick between eating for a day and having sex that day which would I pick? Or do you mean which one do I find more satisfying?

If it's "which would you do if you could pick one and only one for a day," I'd pick eating--that's a no-brainer.

If it's "which is more satisfying of the two," I'd pick sex.

Requx said:
The question is why not mix the two, Salami sandwich + sex= salami sex awesomeness
Someone's been watching Seinfeld.
 

Andronicus

Terror Australis
Mar 25, 2009
1,846
0
0
NickCaligo42 said:
Andronicus said:
You need to be clear. Do you mean if I have to pick between eating for a day and having sex that day which would I pick? Or do you mean which one do I find more satisfying?

If it's "which would you do if you could pick one and only one for a day," I'd pick eating--that's a no-brainer.

If it's "which is more satisfying of the two," I'd pick sex.
Sorry, but I make no apologies for whether the question is clear or not. I'm repeating exactly as it was said on the Great Debate. The teams were given the topic "Food is better than sex", and their side (Negative or Affirmative) and then asked to make an argument about it. That's how a formal debate works. Obviously this is not a formal debate, being on an internet forum, but the general idea still applies, with the added benefit that you get to pick which side you are on. You have to weigh up all sides of the argument and make a decision based on that.

That said, I personally think of it this way: obviously you can't live without food, and the human race can't exist without sex. There are pros and cons to either side. I don't think of it as a "one or the other" situation, I weigh up the pros and cons of each side and make my decision based on that. Incidentally, I said earlier in the thread that my choice would be food. I'm not saying "I PICK FOOD THEREFORE THAT MEANS I HATE SEX AND NEVER EVER WANT TO HAVE INTERCOURSE!!", I just looked at the question "Is food better than sex", weighed up each side, and decided to side with the affirmative.
 

seanez

New member
Apr 30, 2009
36
0
0
You can combine both!
Like with chocolate mousse. Try putting that on your manhood. Wait no, don't do that, it looks like poo. Then it looks like you got shit on your weiner.
 

Phantomess

New member
Sep 19, 2009
417
0
0
Tough, but I'll go with food. Food is more immediately necessary for ME to live. As for the continuation of the human race... I'm currently happy to leave that to other people. :)
 

dalek sec

Leader of the Cult of Skaro
Jul 20, 2008
10,237
0
0
troth said:
Greyfox105 said:
I don't think you'd catch a rather nasty STD from a hamburger...
Have you eaten at McDonald's lately? [small]Oh snap[/small]

OT: Being a fuck-ugly, mentally ill social reject, (Yes, I'm a wee bit depressed right now) I think it's safe to say that I will never indulge in a sexual act without an exchange of currency. Therefore: food it is. Bring on the curry's.
Same here, might as well enjoy what life has to offer food wise since the only way I'm getting into a sexual act is first with the exchanging of money....