He is wrong, but
she is right by definition, because she is the head of the household and her word is law. Table the issue until you're 18 and you have your own place.
Daystar Clarion said:
An American's right to bare arms went right out of date about 100 years ago.
Inalienable rights do not go "out of date", access to whatever force needed to keep your rights inviolate foremost among them.
Trivun said:
Yes, he is. I'm an advocate of strict gun control, the only people who should be allowed guns are the police, the military, and licensed shooting ranges for recreational purposes.
Demented Teddy said:
If guns are legal it means it is far more easy for dangerous people to acquire them.
All the arguments I've heard from people who describe themselves as "strict gun control advocates" contain this spoken or unspoken assumption: "Restricting
legal access to guns will result in fewer criminals having guns." If this assumption were true, "Yay gun control!" would be a no-brainer. Unfortunately, this assumption is only true on Nega-Earth in the Bizarro Universe.
socialmenace42 said:
So you need a gun, Why exactly?
Daystar Clarion said:
I just think that it's unnecessary for people to own a gun outside a firing range or for hunting.
Rainboq said:
Okay, let me ask you this, what good came come from it?
Sober Thal said:
People who are spoiled sometimes want more than they deserve.
Krion_Vark said:
Points for you not to get a gun:
1)YOU DON'T NEED IT.
"Why do you
need your own car?"
"Why do you
need your own house?"
"Why do you
need your own vote?"
This is America,
comrade. The only reason you're entitled to as to why I pursue something is, "I want one."
Malifact said:
It'd be like buying an electric guitar, and then just hanging it up on your wall to look at 'cause it's cool, not that you'd actually use it.
That's my right.
Rainboq said:
Okay, now think of all that can go wrong.
1. If you got in a rage, you have a weapon.
According to this logic, I should have stabbed everyone I know because I own kitchen knives.
Demented Teddy said:
If the state has full control of the firearms then we have less to worry about.
A couple of countries have tried out the "All power to the state" theory. It's never worked out remotely well.
Dungus said:
there shouldn't be a weapon around that can kill a man in a heartbeat, without having to actually do something besides pushing a little metal switch. It's too easy, compared to doing something physical.
"Ideally, defending your life should be more difficult."...? Buh?
GLo Jones said:
I just pictured you sat in a chair holding a rifle, staring at the door, waiting for trouble.
See, this is the root of the problem. When picking a side in a debate, your opinion needs to be based in
typical reality. Picturing the above when you think "typical gun owner" is like picturing someone living in obscene wealth when you think "typical lottery-ticket buyer". I'm like, that's what happens the
least often!
It's impossible for me to take you seriously as a reasoning being as soon as you start arguing that wanting a gun is a sure indicator of anything about one's character.
DeadlyYellow said:
A rifle doesn't serve any other practical purpose than shooting at a ranged target. Humans being predisposed towards violence will inevitably grow bored of shooting a nonliving target. Best they spend time hunting creatures than turning on their neighbors. Knowing you've killed something is quite exhilarating.
Though better a rifle than a handgun. Many seem to believe merely owning a handgun entitles them to carry it. Carrying it means you're far more likely to use it in favor of rational behavior.
Like this. "Having a gun causes psychopathy, and psychopathy is the only reason someone would want a gun for a non-utilitarian purpose." *Facepalm* Please base your arguments in typical reality.
Sober Thal said:
Are you in fear for your life at the home you live in? Is that why you want a gun for yourself? Or is this about bragging rites?
And this.
Irishhoodlum said:
what do you possibly gain from having a gun other than boosting your ego a bit
And this.
Rainboq said:
Yeah, but look at Canada, gun crime is extremely low because guns are tightly regulated and such.
Correlation is not causation.
MelasZepheos said:
Having no gun, while it might mean you personally cannot defend yourself, removes the temptation to take the law into your own hands and enact a legal killing.
"It's better to die for the sake of principle than to kill for the sake of your life." *Facepalm* *Facedesk* *Facedesk* *Facewall*