Poll: Is it time for WWIII?

Recommended Videos

TheSapphireKnight

I hate Dire Wolves...
Dec 4, 2008
692
0
0
Overlord Moo said:
unstable/dangerous countries are getting closer and closer to nuclear weapons
Hey, I live in a country like that the only difference is we already have nukes.

Can you guess where I live?
 

Ago Iterum

New member
Dec 31, 2007
1,366
0
0
You don't just have a world war because the world is in a bad state right now. How could that possibly help? And how would you decide the teams in this 'for the sake of it' war?

UN leader: "Okay China, you stand over there, and America, you stand over there."

US: "Okay... I piiick... Britain!"

GB: "Yess!" *Runs over and high fives America*

China: "Fine, I pick Russia!"

Russia: "Awh man..." *Russia walks over sullen faced*

France: "Ooh, ooh! America, pick me! Pick me pick me pick me!!"

US: "I piiick..." *Long pause* "Oh god, I have no other friends!"
 

Mr_spamamam

New member
Mar 4, 2009
604
0
0
What we need is another war. guess the peter jackson film thats from and win a prize

It might be a good idea though. too many people, not enough stuff to go around.
 

DerpyDerpyDerp

New member
Mar 27, 2009
338
0
0
Some countries might be having some problems soon (N. Korea and Iran, I'm looking at you) but nothing on a war scale, I hope.
 

aeros320

New member
Dec 25, 2008
57
0
0
what so we should have a war because of terrorism.....to kill millions of more people? like does the person who created this thread even KNOW what happened in WWII?????
 

TheTygerfire

New member
Jun 26, 2008
2,403
0
0
Overlord Moo said:
I'm not for it
Then why the hell did you make a topic asking if we should just have it?

You can't just say "Alright, let's all get together and kill each other next week". Even if it's a wrong reason, you have to have a reason to go to war, it's not something you do because you're bored and there's a lot of shit going on.
 

USSR

Probably your average communist.
Oct 4, 2008
2,367
0
0
I believe WWIII is inevitable and it will happen soon!

Oh wait I forgot..Bush is out of office.

Nevermind, we have a good 10-20 years =D
 

CriticallyAcclaimed

New member
Apr 6, 2009
194
0
0
WW3, if it happens - sorry, WHEN it happens - will last all of 6 minutes, cause everyone's getting nuked. Considering that, hell no I don't want WW3 anytime soon.
Besides, who's at war? "Everyone stand by the Americans and gang up on the third world" is hardly what I call WW3.
 

Gladion

New member
Jan 19, 2009
1,470
0
0
Yeah, it's not like it was back in Nazi Germany, where 90% of the population was the allies' enemy while the rest were either exiled, hiding or working in concentration camps. Who vs. Who would be the first question. You can't go against any arabian states because most of those people are very well sane and not agreeing with the terrors
 

ElephantGuts

New member
Jul 9, 2008
3,520
0
0
No, the Cold War was the time for WWIII. Frankly I can't believe humanity was lucky enough to have avoided it then. But if we could manage to avoid slaughtering eachother on a massive scale then, I'm fairly confident that we can manage it now.
 

Zombie_Fish

Opiner of Mottos
Mar 20, 2009
4,584
0
0
WWIII will probably happen soon, with the rise of nuclear stockpiles, terrorism, paranoia, torture, deprivation of human rights and economic crisis, but if it happens now, then what I'm worried about is that if it does happen now, then the nuclear weapons will be brought in (I have always been against nuclear missiles and have protested against them) and the world will probably be terribly scarred as a result or destroyed and it will be hard for humanity to restore itself.
 

nikomas1

New member
Jul 3, 2008
754
0
0
Dele said:
nikomas1 said:
You can never *Win* a war on terrorists, it can't be dome, the only way to win that is to convince the terrorists that they are wrong, and that will never happen.
How bout killing all of them?
It has been tried, the germans tried it in WWII, and they didn't get them all, right?

What I mean is, even if you try to kill them all, there will always be someone to "carry on" the legacy.
 

gh0ti

New member
Apr 10, 2008
251
0
0
Ago Iterum said:
You don't just have a world war because the world is in a bad state right now. How could that possibly help? And how would you decide the teams in this 'for the sake of it' war?

UN leader: "Okay China, you stand over there, and America, you stand over there."

US: "Okay... I piiick... Britain!"

GB: "Yess!" *Runs over and high fives America*

China: "Fine, I pick Russia!"

Russia: "Awh man..." *Russia walks over sullen faced*

France: "Ooh, ooh! America, pick me! Pick me pick me pick me!!"

US: "I piiick..." *Long pause* "Oh god, I have no other friends!"
This guy wins. Though I'm not sure how you'd decide who gets to pick first. Coin toss?
 

Ago Iterum

New member
Dec 31, 2007
1,366
0
0
gh0ti said:
Ago Iterum said:
You don't just have a world war because the world is in a bad state right now. How could that possibly help? And how would you decide the teams in this 'for the sake of it' war?

UN leader: "Okay China, you stand over there, and America, you stand over there."

US: "Okay... I piiick... Britain!"

GB: "Yess!" *Runs over and high fives America*

China: "Fine, I pick Russia!"

Russia: "Awh man..." *Russia walks over sullen faced*

France: "Ooh, ooh! America, pick me! Pick me pick me pick me!!"

US: "I piiick..." *Long pause* "Oh god, I have no other friends!"
This guy wins. Though I'm not sure how you'd decide who gets to pick first. Coin toss?
They'd roshambo for it.