Bulletinmybrain said:
Your science fails.
... (Which I doubt at this point, seeing as all are mapped out)
Mmmmm yeah, while the human genome is mapped out, they are still determining what genes do what and when and how. They haven't perfectly mapped it out saying, "All these genes are responsible for this, and all these genes over here do this. And these genes do this."
You can check it out here: http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/home.shtml
Essentially, sexual orientation has been identified as a group of biological factors in the human body, plain and simple. Whether it's a genetic trait or functional development remains to be seen - but there are biological indicators that identify with homosexual behavior.
You can't say that it's entirely a choice - the choice comes whether to suppress the urges or follow them. And some people have difficulty suppressing natural, biological functions.
All this is based on fact and research. You can check APA studies, various WHO studies and several European physiological studies. Almost all evidence points to a series of biological and mental factors that appear as the person develops. Some as early as 8 or 9 years old.
Thewolfman said:
I throughly applaud you. Seriously, being someone with gay family members its nice to hear intelligence on the nature vs nurture debate. I was actually going to type out a long similar message but i think you just summed up my arguement.
Thank you. One thing that the scientific community is trying to impress on society is that this isn't something to be afraid of. It's not a communicable or directly learned behavior. There are many complex factors involved, and to try and pinpoint any one at this time is merely a waste of time. What we can identify is the cultural, social and personal impact of homosexual behavior, and mostly, it's harmless, as it is a sexual orientation without deviant methodology.
Most people who say it's purely a nuture thing should go and read about the science behind being gay. Not just the psychological or the sociological, but the chemical and biological research. My degree required it, and I find it to be something quite interesting. Especially the cultural aspects of it.