Poll: Is there honestly enough of a graphics difference between the 360 and PS3 to make it a selling point
- Thread starter Piotr621
- Start date
Recommended Videos
PC + Crysis = EPIC WIN!!! seriously if you people actually think that there's a difference between 360 and PS3 graphics then I weep for you and I say that you all need to play Crysis to see a REAL game (graphically speaking of course)
Because it's obvious that a First-party exclusive is going to look better than the Multi-platforms, especially with the amount of time Guerrilla had been working on it. It's impressive, yes, but it doesn't prove that the Xbox 360 is incapable of doing the same thing.Indigo_Dingo said:
Besides, you don't compare apples and oranges. Comparing two of the same games on different systems is more accurate for figuring out what particular strengths and weaknesses of the competing consoles.
All I can tell, is that it depends on your T.V. more than it does the console. If you have the HDTV to go with it, get that PS3.
that's not true. cross platform games almost always look better on 360, because the methods needed to compensate for the ps3's wacky architecture doesn't translate over to 360 or PC.ignosco said:
all you need to do is go read some of eurogamer's "face off" articles if you want proof. Theyve probably compared close to 100 cross platform games so far. and not those retarded vid comparisons like gametrailers (which are completely useless because of the macroblocking). they have lossless screenshots overlays. in depth dissection of resolution, AA/AF methods, texture detail, frame-rate, screen tear & load times.
note: I own a PS3 & 360 & gaming PC.
So you post a poor photo that still isn't quite as bad as the screenshot and you think that we should be impressed by a physics engine that can do some primitive particles.Mazty said:
It's quite alright if you are wowed, just don't expect the rest of us to follow.
"Enough said" should've happened a few posts ago, but you just keep replying to a "troll". What is wrong with you?
I have both systems, I dont play them side by side or anything, but I honestly dont see any difference. I dont notice any difference for blu ray either, looks just like normal DvD to me. And most people havent seemed to notice that although theres a couple Ps3/360 Exclusive games, They havent noticed that almost every game is shared by both consoles, and they all have the same graphics, I dont care what you say, but ive bought a few of the same games for both systems - and the graphics are the same. Maybe someone else with Highly trained 200000/200000 vision or something, might be able to see a slight difference (ZAWMG SEE LOOK ROFL THAT GUN HAS A BETTER BARREL ON PS3) But I dont. The 360 seems capable of everything the Ps3 is.Indigo_Dingo said:
Number 1 criteria for getting a networked-enabled console: Just get whatever your friends have!
Amazing graphics does not always make a good game!
Honestly, graphics are not worth talking about. Some games look better on certain consoles, but it's hit and miss which ones. It's all about how much time and cash the developers put into each port.
And yes, a good PC blows both 360 and PS3 away. Played Crysis, Fallout 3 and Dead Space on a 4870 x2 and 3.8 quad core - amazing! But I should hope so, as it'll cost you five times as much as a console.
OP - don't bother listening to fanboys drivelling on about the miniscule graphical advantages of their console in certain parts of certain games.
I got bored of this cr*p decades ago. Commodore 64 was the winner. Period.
Amazing graphics does not always make a good game!
Honestly, graphics are not worth talking about. Some games look better on certain consoles, but it's hit and miss which ones. It's all about how much time and cash the developers put into each port.
And yes, a good PC blows both 360 and PS3 away. Played Crysis, Fallout 3 and Dead Space on a 4870 x2 and 3.8 quad core - amazing! But I should hope so, as it'll cost you five times as much as a console.
OP - don't bother listening to fanboys drivelling on about the miniscule graphical advantages of their console in certain parts of certain games.
I got bored of this cr*p decades ago. Commodore 64 was the winner. Period.
Not yet. Bit does it really matter?All that good graphics seem to get used for these days is dirt-simulation.
There is zero difference between the 2 consoles at the moment.
But the day that they actually DO tap into the PS3's "power", as all fanboy would like us to believe, will be the day I am enjoying even superior graphics on the X720. Sony has lost this generation, especially with their "ten-year-plan".
But the day that they actually DO tap into the PS3's "power", as all fanboy would like us to believe, will be the day I am enjoying even superior graphics on the X720. Sony has lost this generation, especially with their "ten-year-plan".