You don't even kind of pay attention, and that's the whole problem. You flame me for not reading and yet you missed everything I said.LordOmnit said:Sorry for taking your several times of ASKING WHICH JEDI (implying you didn't know that it was said master) and just jumping off without even thinking about the various possibilities straight away and soundly bitching about it.
Someone mentioned before about the KOTOR timeline being pretty darn strong, the book ones being VERY strong, and the movie ones being relatively weaker, so if you had been reading, then you could have just taken that into account and made note for each level (presumably Spiderman couldn't beat a Sith Lord capable of keeping a fleet of warships made of loose bits of scrap together, but Spiderman could beat the pants, underwear, and unmentionable parts off of Luke (at least I think so)).
So yeah, I was totally flaming none the less.
My statements in brief:
- Jedi differ greatly in power depending on media format (movies, books, video games, anime, etc).
- There is no hard cap on what a Jedi "Master" is capable of. There were lots of Jedi Masters. Some can apparently blow up planets. Others have trouble catching falling beams.
- Many people are treating a Jedi Master as a being who has unlimited abilities of telekinesis, foresight, and telepathy. They also act as if they are complete masters of the lightsabre. Finally, the assumption seems to be being made that this hypothetical Jedi can do all these things at the same time. Yet no Jedi, ever, has been able to do that.
- If we were given a specific Jedi Master (i.e. Could the Anime version of Mace Windu be defeated one on one) we could evaluate his abilities.
Thus: Which Jedi?
In short, I've already said everything you just said, but also took it a step further to say that the debate is flawed in principle (one can't design an opponent against a force that keeps changing in power). And then you flamed me for it.
I don't feel it was deserved, and I was hoping that, once you had a chance to read over the whole thread, you'd realize your mistake. You did appear to have some valid points to make. Thus far, however, this has not been the case.
Ta.
- J