Please could you give me a link or more specific example? I've read the same threads, and though I've seen some folks saying "You've no right to stop me buying and enjoying this", I've not seen folks say "You've no right to complain about it".Moonlight Butterfly said:It happens all the time 'I'm sick of hearing about...*insert complaint here*' and all the flak Sarkeesian has gotten just from saying her opinion.
Maybe we're disagreeing about what 'complaining' is. Lemme unpack it a little.
I'm sorry, but I just think that's a very inaccurate thing to say given the evidence here. Multiple people in every thread I've seen you post in have listened and responded with thoughtful arguments, and that is the opposite of being dismissed.I guess it easy for people to dismiss complaints about representation when they are the ones who are catered to 90% of the time. It's called being privileged.
And by saying it like this I think you're poisoning the well a little bit, right? You're saying "If you disagree, well, that's just because you're privileged". In effect, you are dismissing any argument against you. The equivalent dismissive argument would be "If you disagree, well, that's just because you're a woman", but I don't think anyone's said that.
And 'privilege' in this case is not a special moral label, it really just means being a larger section of the market. Same way people who like FPS' are privileged compared to people like adventure games, they get bigger budget games and more options. It's not a big conspiracy to dismiss the opinions of women (or adventure game lovers) in any general sense (as I sometimes feel you are suggesting), it's entirely market forces.
(Maaaybe there's a chicken and egg thing and women aren't catered to, hence they don't like games in general, hence they're not catered to. But really, it would only take a few games that -do- cater to women for their to be a big explosion of female gamers. Those games have been made and that hasn't happened, so I'm gonna guess that there are other social or biological factors at work).
And I say all this when I actually agree with your tastes almost completely. I also hated the Witcher for being juvenile (Witcher 1 at least, I haven't played 2). But I just played more Mass Effect instead. I also find the Sorceress faintly ridiculous, so I'd probably play the Ranger chick. I also think Nathan Drake is bland, so I'll play Tomb Raider.
So there's some options there already, and while I'll be right there with you campaigning for more options still (sexualised women and brutalised men are way overrepresented and are such lazy options, I agree!), I will definitely stand against you if you are trying to change existing games to make them more acceptable to our tastes, or if you are attempting to shame people who happen to like other things.
I will stand against you, not because I'm 'privileged', not because I don't think you have a right to complain, but because the majority are entitled to their games too and I don't think we should be trying to make them feel bad about it.
In short, I think we'll get change by saying "C'mon, that again? Let's have more of this please! Take my money!" rather than "You made -that-?! You should be ashamed!"
Cheers!