Poll: Kinsey scale, where are you?

[MattRobinson]

I am equally disinterested in women and men
so X

 

[Mr.Mattress]

I'm at 0, because the idea of me with another guy kind of grosses me out. That doesn't mean I'm against Homosexuals or Homosexuality, I'm simply against me doing Homosexual acts.

Besides, women are hot.

 

[Necroid_Neko]

I find other women attractive, and often more so than men, but I've never found a woman I felt sexually attracted to so I guess I'm a 1 :/

 

[Sandytimeman]

I consider myself a 4 on the scale. I believe the scale is at least a better thing to use than say black and white your gay or your not, OR the even worse, if your gay your evil type of thinking from various religions.

 

[RatRace123]

I'd say 1, under the right circumstances I could see myself getting with another guy.
Those right circumstances being the exchange of money, naturally.

I'm of the belief that for the right price anyone would go outside their sexual comfort zone.

 

[Jonluw]

I wouldn't claim to be 100% heterosexual in the sense that I'm immune to homoromantic thougts and such, but I don't exactly find it appropriate to describe myself as "incidentally homosexual".

0.5, I guess.

Is just about where I am. I can be emotionally attracted to men easily and wouldn't give a flat-out "No" to a guy who was interested in me if they were really something special, but it's just much easier for me to be romantically and sexually attracted to women.

If so you're further up on the scale than me.
I would definitely turn down any man who was interested in a romantic or sexual relationship with me.

I forgot to add that I gravitate a little bit towards X as well by the way.

 

[Broady Brio]

I think it's changed constantly my life.

I'd like to think I'm a 0. But maybe 1? Though I tell my friends I'm a X so they will leave me the hell alone about relationships.

 

[Nimcha]

It's odd to see the Kinsey scale is so popular on the internet. It has a fascinating history, Kinsey practically coined the term bisexuality in the professional sense and was perhaps one of the most progressive psychosocioligists ever, but his work is crude and prudish by today's standards. Still a big hero of mine though.

Same here! Some people seem to be under the impression that it's the be all end all of sexuality scales, but it's clearly not. It's just a little more detailed than the usual 'straight-bi-gay' scale. And people forget it's highly personal, some people are more capable than others to move around on the scale a bit while others are just pretty much in the same position for most of their lives.

Incidentally I'm a 6 myself, if anyone cares.

 

[mplantinga]

I picked 6. While there were some moments in my life that seemed otherwise, in retrospect they seemed like embodiments of straight society's expectations rather than anything true to myself.

 

[EeveeElectro]

I'd say either 2 or 3. There's a few ladies I have fancied and I've experimented with both sexes and enjoyed it, but I lean more towards the guys.

Also I don't want to be like a lot of people I know who love the attention they get from being bisexual. :/ I'm putting it down to hormones to be honest.

 

[chaosyoshimage]

Although I think it's kind of funny that you assumed it would be a man to pick, and it ended up being me instead.

Lol, I figured that would happen, I should have went with "someone gayer than me".

 

[Atmos Duality]

I'm a 3.14159265. Only sexually attracted to irrational numbers. So long and hard to calculate.

Cheer up! By degrees of infinity, there are more potential irrational numbers than integers!
You're bound to find a match eventually!

 

[Atmos Duality]

It would take forever to get to really know a single one of them though. We can barely scratch the surface of a number that never ends much less one so unpredictable as an irrational number...

Think of it this way: That represents endless potential for a relationship!
There's so much to explore in each other! You'll never get bored!

 

[Risingblade]

I'm probably a .999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999998

 

[ShindoL Shill]

uhhh... Y? where's pansexual on this scale?
and if you really wanted to be accurate, it would need gynosexual and androsexual.

 

[Phlakes]

1, because Nathan Fillion, David Tennant, etc. exist, but also because being completely exclusive to either is impossible.

 

[WhyBotherToTry]

1 or 2 but I haven't done anything with a guy for a while