Poll: Large Hadron Collider

Recommended Videos

chuketek

New member
Sep 28, 2009
70
0
0
d3structor said:
chuketek said:
all right here's a question: when a star collapses into a black hole does it's gravitational field change at all, and if it doesn't what happens to anything that gets sucked up by it?
Short answer (I tried writing a long, descriptive one but it was pretty enormous and pretty boring).
Far away =no, Close up =yes, a bit(but the supernova would be a more immediate concern), Inside what used to be the star's radius =gets much stronger.

The black hole's field would increase proportionally to its mass, which would include anything it sucks up. As for what happens to it, that's anyone's guess, there are theories, but no-one's really got a clue what the ultimate ground state of matter is in a field that strong, could be quarks, could be some denomination lower.
 

chuketek

New member
Sep 28, 2009
70
0
0
Dramatic Flare said:
How many hours of paperwork and/or mathematics goes into one single firing of the LHC?
Has any damage been done yet (something that needed to be fixed before it could be used again)?
Is it intimidating to work with a large group of people who have PhDs while you are still working towards yours?
Are any of them hot? (Stupid question, but a fun one nonetheless.)
Have you found or discovered anything by accident yet? For instance, have you tried finding the Higgs Boson but instead found a quark somehow outside of a proton?
Have you guys considered putting something random and stupid inside, just for shits and giggles?
When will you actually try and find the Higgs Boson?
Righto:
-Pass. I work on the ATLAS experiment, it's a completely different piece of kit from the actual LHC accelerator with a separate control room and separate staff. But if it's anything like ours then there would have been masses of paperwork and mathematics to set the thing up, but now all the fine details are controlled by computer. You can go in and tell it what to do manually, but for the most part you just click go and then (carefully) monitor it.
-I haven't heard of any damage recently, there was that fiasco with the magnets a year or so ago, but the biggest problem with that was that the masses of liquid helium used to cool the magnets made the tunnels so cold that they had to wait for it to WARM UP before they could send anyone down. Everything's working fine right now though.
-Yes.
-Being physics it's about 80-90% male. But you do get a couple of knock-outs here and there (mostly there).
-Not yet. Unfortunately most discoveries take a good few months-years of analysis. At the moment we're happy to be getting a tonne of data to analyse. Discoveries come later.
-No, you have no idea how expensive the damage caused would be if you did that inside one of the detectors, and it wouldn't be any fun in the main pipe because it's only a few centimetres across.
I wouldn't mind seeing what happens if, for instance, you put a melon in the beam dump (basically a big pile of concrete which they fire the beam into when they want to get rid of it). To my knowledge no-one's done it... yet... Could turn it into a youtube show, "Will it vaporize" or something.
-We're getting seriously underway with out part of the search within the year. Will we find it, I have no idea I'm not really a theorist and even the theorists are about 50/50 on that.
 

Darmort

New member
Mar 16, 2009
230
0
0
It fires particles at each other. When it fired, the two particles that fired collided with each other and created the force of a gnat flying into your hand. It took enough energy to power Coventry for three months to do so.

Apparently. I haven't really looked into it.

Oh, there was also around a 49% chance that the thing would blow a hole in Europe according to some American scientist who has been proved wrong over and over and his bogus theories on physics have always proven false...