yes. these are horrible horrible stupid arguements trying to have justification.Woodsey said:Piracy is stealing, stealing is a crime. Disputing that fact is moronic.
I'm sick of the "try-before-you-buy"; "I can't afford it, but what difference does it make?"; "Why do corporations deserve my money?"; "DRM made me do it!" bullshit arguments.
True that, but I wasn't gonna suggest that you pirate it too.Sev72 said:fenrizz said:Avtivision did not lose 123 million.Sev72 said:*Sigh* To summarize. Piracy is stealing. You are depriving a company of money for their product, I am not sure what stealing is if it isn't that.
Everyone brings up the argument that people are pirate games are just "testing the game" they are making sure that the company made a good product etc... Really? How many people once they have a game will actually go out and buy it because they now think it is good?
Lets figure half, that sound like a huge overestimate but we will just use it as an example.
MW2 had 4.1 million illegal downloads on the PC (these stats come from Torrent Freak who say they get them from torrent trackers). Simple math says that Activision lost 123 million in revenue due to piracy. I would say thats a rather large sum of money.
I think I will just save this and copy paste it into any other threads that pop up.
There is no proof that even one of those 4.1 million would have bought the game if it had not been available for downloading.
Well you can't prove it either way, but let me put it a different way: They lost (in my example) 123 million in revenue on a product was used, but not paid for.
To bring it back to the argument at hand: So if wasn't free they might not have gotten the game? That is logical and does indeed make sense. But why should they get to play the game for free when I have to pay $60 for it? If you say well you could just pirate too and then applied that logic to everyone then no one would get to play video games or listen to music because there would be no money to produce it.
That is horribly arrogant of you.gmaverick019 said:yes. these are horrible horrible stupid arguements trying to have justification.
Define stealing then? You are taking data that doesn't belong to you, without paying for it or asking permission, thats stealing. Thats the very definition of it, well data can be changed for whatever.Devour said:Well, actually, it's not theft. Not in the eyes of the law, economists or the vast majority of consumers.Icecoldcynic said:This topic will not end well. Let me just say that piracy, no matter how you see it, is stealing. I don't care how people try to sugar-coat it by claiming 'try before you buy' or other such bullshit, because you know full well it's stealing.
Whether this stops you doing it or not is another matter, but just don't try to call it something it's not. Admit, and accept that you're a thief who steals their games.
Devour said:discussed to death.
TerranReaper said:done to death
MaxChaos said:done to death
BehattedWanderer said:done to death
And you people say the topic of piracy is repetitive...Darkenwrath said:DONE TO DEATH
Could you define consequences? The statistics I cited were from an independent site so I fail to see how the gaming industries claims affect what I said.fenrizz said:True that, but I wasn't gonna suggest that you pirate it too.*snip*
The video game industry is bigger than ever, and MW2 is now the most sold game ever created.
I do not for a second believe that the consequences of piracy are even close to as big as the industry claims.
But, my point was; 1 download does not equal 1 lost sale.
Also, Piracy is not the same stealing.
And claiming that it is, is a time proven way to derail any attempt at constructive debate on the subject.
In parts of Europe it's legal to download software for personal use. It's against the law to share it with anyone else, but legal to download.Nikajo said:However it is a crime because it's breaking copyright laws. That's kind of the reason those laws exist. You can make any justification you like - like I said, I honestly could not care less. But it is a fact that you are breaking the law. If that doesn't bother you then don't worry about it!
One point - prohibition was a boon to organized crime as it provided a huge profit opportunity - to whit, booze sales. With piracy, the downloaders aren't willing to pay anything much - in fact, the recent "Humble Bundle" where you could name your own price (i.e. $0.01), and have it all go to charity still had about 25% of all downloads as piracy.Devour said:The vast majority of people who have access to the internet have done an act of piracy on the internet (something like 90% of teens had over 700 illegally downloaded songs on their portable music players). Making piracy an arrestable crime under law would mean a lot of people would be criminalised for it. See American prohibition, which created organised crime.