This. Unrequited love is terrible.SimuLord said:To love and not be loved in return is purified torture.
To be loved and not love is...well, perhaps an inconvenience, but it is gratifying in its own strange sort of way.
I'll take the latter. The former...ugh.
I Swear I Spot one of your reply's in every single topic I look at xDPirate Kitty said:Ah, fair enough.Ham_authority95 said:My response was coming from my own personal feelings. Obviously we both react differently to being told "I love you" because it means something different to each of us.Pirate Kitty said:Hearing my partner tell me she loves me lights up my world. She shows it every day, but hearing the words... just does something.Ham_authority95 said:I don't believe that "love" really needs a word...
To me, saying "I love you" is possessive and doesn't actually mean that you "love" them, but that you need to falsely reassure them. I don't think that real love needs to be spoken.
Also, your poll is terrible. It doesn't have anything to do with the question in the OP.
...I hate you. *begins to dance*tthor said:What is love? Baby don't hurt me. don't hurt me nomore.
now that song shall be stuck in my head all day. and with any luck, it'll be stuck in your head too.
to answer, i would rather love and not be loved in return. to be loved and not love back is a vain and shallow existence, one with no reward or happiness. I would rather feel love, even without a chance of love back, because atleast i get to feel that something, even if it is mixed with dispair.
I've experienced both, and i would much rather be the one in love than the one to be loved
Because yes, yes that is entirely true after going through that three times. I have yet to find out how it feels like to be loved.SimuLord said:To love and not be loved in return is purified torture.
This does, however, leave open the question of what it would be like for the other party if indeed I were loved but couldn't love back, since I'd be inflicting that self-same torture on her. Nasty little catch-22, that.Cowabungaa said:To be loved and not be able to love in return. Hands down, bar none, not remotely worth pondering about. SimuLord said it right:
Because yes, yes that is entirely true after going through that three times. I have yet to find out how it feels like to be loved.SimuLord said:To love and not be loved in return is purified torture.
As long as you can make her feel that way it doesn't make any difference whether you truly love her or not. It still pumps her brain full of the chemicals that makes one feel all giggedidy when feeling in love.SimuLord said:This does, however, leave open the question of what it would be like for the other party if indeed I were loved but couldn't love back, since I'd be inflicting that self-same torture on her. Nasty little catch-22, that.Cowabungaa said:To be loved and not be able to love in return. Hands down, bar none, not remotely worth pondering about. SimuLord said it right:
Because yes, yes that is entirely true after going through that three times. I have yet to find out how it feels like to be loved.SimuLord said:To love and not be loved in return is purified torture.
Although I wonder---knowing I could never love someone back, could I make her feel loved? And would that be enough for her? I'd have no dog in the fight---I'm never going to love in this scenario so it's not like I'd be looking elsewhere...just trying to decide if the illusion could clear my conscience.
Then I remember I've done it before. And the girl sure didn't seem to mind.