Para199x said:
CitySquirrel said:
why can't the "minority" instead be "random person who no special skills"... I ask because you have that minority defined only as minority (therefore can't be scientist, hot, etc.). I would suggest that, while maybe not racist, you seem to already have placed a racial assumption in this.
You read way too much into that, it is more likely that you have the occasional racist thought, and in your guilt have decided (maybe subconsciously) that you have to check that everything mentioning race in any form what so ever isn't even tangibly, indirectly, infinitesimally minutely racist in any way, shape or form.
I like how you shut down my criticism there by in no way demonstrating how it isn't racist, but by telling me that my argument isn't legitimate because you say so. After all, there is no racism and no one has unexamined racist assumptions. There is no reason to ever wonder why "minority" is even a choice (which doesn't even have to do with race, except that the author explicitly stated s/he was thinking of race with his/her "no racist" disclaimer) despite the fact that it defines a person purely on one characteristic that sets that person apart from others. See, nothing is divorced from the real world and there are real world implications to this.
I also like how you assumed that I must be feeling some kind of guilt as opposed to being a minority who is upset that I am listed in there as simply "the useless one that you only keep alive so you don't get accused of being prejudiced". Good show all around.