Poll: New forum rules - Yay or Nay?

Recommended Videos

Leg End

Romans 12:18
Oct 24, 2010
2,948
58
53
Country
United States
Bohemian Waltz said:
Am I the only person who tried to type in "I disagree" when it was prompted?
Hell no. XD

I typed in a wide variety of things. Most of which I cannot post here. XD
 

Steppin Razor

New member
Dec 15, 2009
6,868
0
0
LegendaryGamer0 said:
Actually, it has little to do with the current subject. XD

Though, it is still the Pro to what that is to Anti.
n
Might take a while to find it, with the time to find and the fact that my computer is utter shite. >.>
Meh, I'll still look at it.
 

Daedalus1942

New member
Jun 26, 2009
4,169
0
0
jackpipsam said:
I to be honest hate the new system and think they should turn it back.

I mean perm suspension, wtf?

oh well, maybe they will turn it off soon :/
most likely not. A better idea might be to help us effect change by joining our group. if we get enough people, they will not be able to ignore us any longer. http://www.escapistmagazine.com/groups/view/Escapists-against-the-machine
-Tabs<3-
 

Leg End

Romans 12:18
Oct 24, 2010
2,948
58
53
Country
United States
Steppin Razor said:
LegendaryGamer0 said:
Actually, it has little to do with the current subject. XD

Though, it is still the Pro to what that is to Anti.
n
Might take a while to find it, with the time to find and the fact that my computer is utter shite. >.>
Meh, I'll still look at it.
Well, if you want someplace quick(and this being a place that I also disagree with on several issues, including motivations), try Newgon. Google shall take you there. :p

Eh, here is to hoping I don't get banned for that. (=_=)
 

Yureina

Who are you?
May 6, 2010
7,098
0
0
Bohemian Waltz said:
Am I the only person who tried to type in "I disagree" when it was prompted?
I couldn't if I wanted to post my disagreement, which I found kind of gross. >_>

But you can be damn sure I kept that window open for a long while before typing those two words that most certainty were untrue coming from me. One sin in order to allow for promoting the greater good, I suppose.
 

TriGGeR_HaPPy

Another Regular. ^_^
May 22, 2008
1,040
0
0
Samurai Goomba said:
This has been pointed out and beaten to death, but I feel it's important to reiterate that nothing has actually changed. People like Hope Chest (now banned) and myself have been well aware of the "strikes" system used by the Escapist moderators since LONG before this rule change. You all think it's new because you never knew it was there, BUT IT WAS.
It's always these posts that seem to never get the attention they deserve, but you're absolutely right.

Between people seemingly forgetting about it, to those who joined too late to see the last discussion between users and mods where it was brought up, people around here never want to recognise this point.
For a considerably long time, it's been Warnings, then Probation(s), then Suspension(s), then finally the banhammer comes swinging. And if it wasn't called for, then it's not unheard of to see people appeal, and come back from a supposed "perma-ban".

This is just as true now, the only difference being that now we have a visible Forum Health Meter.
 
Apr 29, 2010
4,148
0
0
TriGGeR_HaPPy said:
Samurai Goomba said:
This has been pointed out and beaten to death, but I feel it's important to reiterate that nothing has actually changed. People like Hope Chest (now banned) and myself have been well aware of the "strikes" system used by the Escapist moderators since LONG before this rule change. You all think it's new because you never knew it was there, BUT IT WAS.
It's always these posts that seem to never get the attention they deserve, but you're absolutely right.

Between people seemingly forgetting about it, to those who joined too late to see the last discussion between users and mods where it was brought up, people around here never want to recognise this point.
For a considerably long time, it's been Warnings, then Probation(s), then Suspension(s), then finally the banhammer comes swinging. And if it wasn't called for, then it's not unheard of to see people appeal, and come back from a supposed "perma-ban".

This is just as true now, the only difference being that now we have a visible "Forum Health Meter".
That's the one problem I have with the updated rules. That the "health meter" is visible. To everyone. I just feel it should be kept private. That way, the only ones who can see it are you and the staff members(including moderators). I mean, you don't see people in school districts or those who work in law enforcement openly talking about the contents of one's permanent record. They'd get penalized for that, even culminating in the loss of their job. It just doesn't seem right.

Also, the little part underneath the meter that calls me a citizen..I find it hilarious. Makes me think of 1984.
 

Latinidiot

New member
Feb 19, 2009
2,215
0
0
What does it matter? Just stay on the straight and narrow.

You know, reading the rules I have to say that they are worded a bit too formal. And in the words of the great scholar Brother Genitivi: Nothing inspires to misschief like telling someone not to do something.
 

Lizardon

Robot in Disguise
Mar 22, 2010
1,055
0
0
They seem harsh, considering that I don't see much need to be cracking down on the forums. Unless there has been an increase in warnings/probations, then I can understand why such a system has been implemented.
 

Best of the 3

10001110101
Oct 9, 2010
7,083
0
41
New rules eh? Let's see :3

It does seem a bit harsher I'll admit but I guess that can bea good thing. GOt my first warning though a few days ago for what was a joke >.>
 

TriGGeR_HaPPy

Another Regular. ^_^
May 22, 2008
1,040
0
0
superbatranger said:
TriGGeR_HaPPy said:
Samurai Goomba said:
This has been pointed out and beaten to death, but I feel it's important to reiterate that nothing has actually changed. People like Hope Chest (now banned) and myself have been well aware of the "strikes" system used by the Escapist moderators since LONG before this rule change. You all think it's new because you never knew it was there, BUT IT WAS.
It's always these posts that seem to never get the attention they deserve, but you're absolutely right.

Between people seemingly forgetting about it, to those who joined too late to see the last discussion between users and mods where it was brought up, people around here never want to recognise this point.
For a considerably long time, it's been Warnings, then Probation(s), then Suspension(s), then finally the banhammer comes swinging. And if it wasn't called for, then it's not unheard of to see people appeal, and come back from a supposed "perma-ban".

This is just as true now, the only difference being that now we have a visible "Forum Health Meter".
That's the one problem I have with the updated rules. That the "health meter" is visible. To everyone. I just feel it should be kept private. That way, the only ones who can see it are you and the staff members(including moderators). I mean, you don't see people in school districts or those who work in law enforcement openly talking about the contents of one's permanent record. They'd get penalized for that, even culminating in the loss of their job. It just doesn't seem right.

Also, the little part underneath the meter that calls me a citizen..I find it hilarious. Makes me think of 1984.
I'd like to start by saying kudos on the avatar. It's rather brilliant. :D

I still want to think more about it, but at the moment, if there's anything I'm a little worried about, it's the fact that it's public for everyone to see. Just like you, and others here.
While at this point I'm not sure about it, I'm swaying towards your side of the argument.

My post was more directed at those who are saying that this is some massive change in the way they'll be handing out their probations, suspensions, etc., when in reality that hasn't really changed at all in this latest version of the forum rules.
 

Siege_TF

New member
May 9, 2010
582
0
0
I'm going to miss the reaction images and youtube imbeddments greatly, as I view a thread as a whole rather than the independant posters. I blame 4 chan. I mean satan (sorry for the redundancy to those who make no distinction).

I'm making an extra sentance to fluff out my post so it doesn't get moderated for 'emptiness', Altana knows I've done enough runs for this and that in the Promyvions to hate the empty with a vengence.

Wait, I can go one better. A haiku for the iron fist wearing a velvet glove;

Mods tighten their grip.
They ensure board quality.
Or limit freedom...
 

vxicepickxv

Slayer of Bothan Spies
Sep 28, 2008
3,126
0
0
Siege_TF said:
I'm going to miss the reaction images and youtube imbeddments greatly, as I view a thread as a whole rather than the independant posters. I blame 4 chan. I mean satan (sorry for the redundancy to those who make no distinction).

I'm making an extra sentance to fluff out my post so it doesn't get moderated for 'emptiness', Altana knows I've done enough runs for this and that in the Promyvions to hate the empty with a vengence.

Wait, I can go one better. A haiku for the iron fist wearing a velvet glove;

Mods tighten their grip.
They ensure board quality.
Or limit freedom...
Well, it is a message board for a privately run company. The fact that they've set this much up shows that they at least have something that resembles standards.

I'm not going to agree or disagree with everything in the rules. I'm not going to argue them, or agree with all of them.

I know that one of my warnings was relatively justified, as it was a single word reply, however the other was an image, which in and of itself, contained a message that I feel was warranted.

I guess that means if I use the image now, I have to explain why I used it. Or I could read the rules again, and see if I can do that.
 

TriGGeR_HaPPy

Another Regular. ^_^
May 22, 2008
1,040
0
0
Siege_TF said:
I'm going to miss the reaction images and youtube imbeddments greatly...
Hehe. I'm going to just respond to this (because I have no qualms with the rest of your post), but just quickly... Nice haiku. :D

Just about you "miss[ing] the reaction images and youtube embedding", though...
<spoiler=Pic>http://images.cheezburger.com/completestore/2009/8/28/128959198667859009.jpg

(A lot of this is directed at people in general, Siege. I'm just using your post to say this, it's nothing personal.)
As it has always been, people are allowed to have images and YouTube embeds in their post. The problem the mods have is when a post is made up by nothing except the aforementioned vid or picture. (If you're adding something like that to your post, it should help your point in some way, too.)
You could possibly argue that it's a bit of a roundabout way of doing so, but it's merely to stop people posting responses which really have no reason to be there, except maybe to get their post count up.
If it's worth responding to, surely you can think of at least a full sentence to post?

As for putting them in spoiler tags (something you didn't ask about, but I'll bring it up anyway while I'm here), that's just so that you don't annoy people. Some people don't have super-speedy internet, and when people start posting more than a couple pics or vids in a thread, it can greatly affect the speed with which they can load the thread they're just trying to be a part of.
 

Nihilism_Is_Bliss

New member
Oct 27, 2009
496
0
0
The new rules would be ok if the moderators weren't so trigger-happy.
Eventually everyone who posts regularly will get hit by enough moderators having bad days that everyone will eventually be banned.
 
Apr 29, 2010
4,148
0
0
TriGGeR_HaPPy said:
Siege_TF said:
I'm going to miss the reaction images and youtube imbeddments greatly...
Hehe. I'm going to just respond to this (because I have no qualms with the rest of your post), but just quickly... Nice haiku. :D

Just about you "miss[ing] the reaction images and youtube embedding", though...
<spoiler=Pic>http://images.cheezburger.com/completestore/2009/8/28/128959198667859009.jpg

(A lot of this is directed at people in general, Siege. I'm just using your post to say this, it's nothing personal.)
As it has always been, people are allowed to have images and YouTube embeds in their post. The problem the mods have is when a post is made up by nothing except the aforementioned vid or picture. You could possibly argue that it's a bit of a roundabout way of doing so, but it's merely to stop people posting responses which really have no reason to be there, except maybe to get their post count up.
If it's worth responding to, surely you can think of at least a full sentence to post?

As for putting them in spoiler tags (something you didn't ask about, but I'll bring it up anyway while I'm here), that's just so that you don't annoy people. Some people don't have super-speedy internet, and when people start posting more than a couple pics or vids in a thread, it can greatly affect the speed with which they can load the thread they're just trying to be a part of.
Heck, that reminds me, sometimes the pages here don't load completely for me. Even when I refresh several times. Not only that, but I find it troublesome that in one of my threads, even after several tries, I keep getting 404 errors when posting. But, I'm not gonna let that, or these newfangled updated rules bother me. I just got accepted to college the other day, so all's good.
 

Vanguard_Ex

New member
Mar 19, 2008
4,687
0
0
maddawg IAJI said:
Vanguard_Ex said:
So now when you're on probation, you're forever on probation? Aw guys, come the fuck on! Loosen up, eh?
We did, now you get 4 chances before being put on probation. All we're doing is putting a set number of times you can break a rule before we kick you out of here.
But that isn't probation. I'm sure you know the meaning of the word but for the sake of argument: probation is a temporary observation of someone to see if their behaviour's improved, if you have someone constantly under probation with the metaphorical mod finger hovering over the suspension button, well, that kind of defeats the object of putting anyone onto probation in the first place.

I agree with the system parameters, definitely, and I think for the new members who aren't quite up to speed with our posting style it offers more than enough choice to be whipped into shape, if you will. I just think that the lack of a chance to redeem oneself, even if it meant taking half a year to get off probation, is somewhat harsh.
I'm not just opposing for the sake of it by the way, I'd be delighted if anything I said is considered even for a second by yourself or the other moderating staff.
 

JoJo

and the Amazing Technicolour Dream Goat 🐐
Moderator
Legacy
Mar 31, 2010
7,170
143
68
Country
🇬🇧
Gender
♂
LegendaryGamer0 said:
Steppin Razor said:
LegendaryGamer0 said:
Actually, it has little to do with the current subject. XD

Though, it is still the Pro to what that is to Anti.
n
Might take a while to find it, with the time to find and the fact that my computer is utter shite. >.>
Meh, I'll still look at it.
Well, if you want someplace quick(and this being a place that I also disagree with on several issues, including motivations), try Newgon. Google shall take you there. :p

Eh, here is to hoping I don't get banned for that. (=_=)
Uggghhh... just looked at that site, wish I hadn't now, feel like I'm about to be sick. I really hope you don't believe that...