Such as...?Gilhelmi said:USA should have been in the top 5. Also, I had a problem with some of the criteria. It just seemed designed to give the US a lower score. They did not take into account the freedoms that America has that the other countries do not have.
I believe you are conceptually conflating 'Quality of Life' (often defined within the context of Developmental Theory) with 'Standard of Living' (which is indeed derived from average income, or more accurately, GNI per capita). Price indexes are incorporated if there is a need to distinguish between nominal or real GNI.Dormin111 said:My biggest problem is their standards for "quality of life," i would assume that would be a measure of average income and price indexes, but Newsweek thinks differently. To them, quality of life is:
- income inequlity (apparently when some people make more than others, that's a bad thing)
- gender gap (a valid measure of quality for only half of the population, should be in a "cultural openess" or "cultural freedom" sector instead)
- percentage living on less than $2 per day (measure of extreme poverty, not of the average quality of life)
- comsumption per capita (the best measurement for quality of life they have)
- homicides per 100,000 (ehhhhh, crime is important, but it would be better if they measured overall crime rather than just murders)
- environmental health (useless, Singapore did relatively badly in it because it's a city, as long as a country isn't horribly polluted, then the environment has little to no effect on the quality of life of the average citizen)
- unemployment rate (should be under economic dynamism and should be more long term, short term unemployment shows nothing)
Here's a completely outrageous idea... but... we could stop oppressing them!octafish said:Number 4? This despite being politically influenced by a bunch of xenophobes from Western Sydney and Queensland? Not bad Australia, now can we be nicer to the oppressed?
Made me look twice too. Obviously living under a Nanny-state Government is considered positive nowadays.octafish said:Number 4? This despite being politically influenced by a bunch of xenophobes from Western Sydney and Queensland? Not bad Australia, now can we be nicer to the oppressed?
It's probably not Cameron's fault (not yet anyway) but I bet it's from the fallout of the last government and the corruption and expenses scandals that dragged our score down.imnotparanoid said:wow UK has pretty high everything, just let down by polotic's, DAM YOU DAVID CAMERON!