Poll: Newsweek Ranking Countries

Recommended Videos

imnot

New member
Apr 23, 2010
3,916
0
0
wow UK has pretty high everything, just let down by polotic's, DAM YOU DAVID CAMERON!
 

megs1120

Wing Commander
Jul 27, 2009
530
0
0
Gilhelmi said:
USA should have been in the top 5. Also, I had a problem with some of the criteria. It just seemed designed to give the US a lower score. They did not take into account the freedoms that America has that the other countries do not have.
Such as...?

We Americans tend to be so full of ourselves, we believe all of our own hype when so much of it falls so far from the truth.

The Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave has more prisoners languishing in prison, and executes more people, per capita than any country on the face of the Earth. The Shining City on a Hill has overthrown more democracies than Germany and the Soviet Union combined.

I hope our generation will live up to our purported national ideals and make them a reality rather than a fantasy.

Who knows, some day we might even top Australia! :D
 

Hateren47

New member
Aug 16, 2010
578
0
0
I'm a little sad to see Denmark as low as 10 but we've lost some points in the education category (21st) although our literacy rating is 99% and average years of schooling is 16.9. South Korea came 2nd in the same category with 97.9% and 14.3 years. Maybe South Koreans just learn things faster than we do.
 

TylerC

New member
Nov 12, 2008
583
0
0
I'm surprised how un-biased they seem to be making the list. I was even more surprised about South Korea placing 15th, so I guess I should be less ignorant about the well being(?) of countries some people either assume or make them out to be.

I would've assumed Singapore would be higher though.
 

Mighty the Moose

New member
Aug 11, 2010
46
0
0
Dormin111 said:
My biggest problem is their standards for "quality of life," i would assume that would be a measure of average income and price indexes, but Newsweek thinks differently. To them, quality of life is:
- income inequlity (apparently when some people make more than others, that's a bad thing)
- gender gap (a valid measure of quality for only half of the population, should be in a "cultural openess" or "cultural freedom" sector instead)
- percentage living on less than $2 per day (measure of extreme poverty, not of the average quality of life)
- comsumption per capita (the best measurement for quality of life they have)
- homicides per 100,000 (ehhhhh, crime is important, but it would be better if they measured overall crime rather than just murders)
- environmental health (useless, Singapore did relatively badly in it because it's a city, as long as a country isn't horribly polluted, then the environment has little to no effect on the quality of life of the average citizen)
- unemployment rate (should be under economic dynamism and should be more long term, short term unemployment shows nothing)
I believe you are conceptually conflating 'Quality of Life' (often defined within the context of Developmental Theory) with 'Standard of Living' (which is indeed derived from average income, or more accurately, GNI per capita). Price indexes are incorporated if there is a need to distinguish between nominal or real GNI.

As Quality of Life formulations go, the one utilized by Newsweek is very standard.

Obviously, both are inherently subjective.
 

viranimus

Thread killer
Nov 20, 2009
4,952
0
0
Murika.. YA!

Were so awesome one #1 wasnt enough... we needed 2!!!.. Whaddya mean that means eleven?
 

RhombusHatesYou

Surreal Estate Agent
Mar 21, 2010
7,595
1,914
118
Between There and There.
Country
The Wide, Brown One.
octafish said:
Number 4? This despite being politically influenced by a bunch of xenophobes from Western Sydney and Queensland? Not bad Australia, now can we be nicer to the oppressed?
Here's a completely outrageous idea... but... we could stop oppressing them!
 

Adzma

New member
Sep 20, 2009
1,287
0
0
octafish said:
Number 4? This despite being politically influenced by a bunch of xenophobes from Western Sydney and Queensland? Not bad Australia, now can we be nicer to the oppressed?
Made me look twice too. Obviously living under a Nanny-state Government is considered positive nowadays.
 

BlackKraken

New member
Apr 4, 2009
196
0
0
14th isn't bad!

Though if this was going by the peoples view of their country then the UK would be bottom. :p

We really go on about "broken britain" and all that crap. I mean, REALLY? Our country is THAT BAD? Because I think its pretty damn good in comparison to a lot of other countries in the world.
 

Sampsa

New member
May 8, 2008
431
0
0
Sheez... our minister of foreign affairs has been smiling like an idiot because of this list. Just google Alexander Stubb.
 

Instinct Blues

New member
Jun 8, 2008
508
0
0
Seems fair to me but once America kicks the South to the curb or at least makes it a more tolerable place to live we'd jump at least 5 spots. IMO the South is holding America back all the ignorance and bible-thumping is hindering people who actually want to make changes based on facts not scare tactics like the Republicans love to use so much.
 

JourneyThroughHell

New member
Sep 21, 2009
5,010
0
0
Well, it's mostly fair for us. 51st or something.
Although I don't get where they took that political instability rating from - things are fairly alright for Russia right now.
 

CouchCommando

New member
Apr 24, 2008
696
0
0
Woo c'mon Australia, yeah wow ...... I'm actually shocked. And I live here. Top 4 .......wow. Well I can't really complain about anything in my life, and If I did I would have to admit that I was just been picky.
 

fullbleed

New member
Apr 30, 2008
765
0
0
imnotparanoid said:
wow UK has pretty high everything, just let down by polotic's, DAM YOU DAVID CAMERON!
It's probably not Cameron's fault (not yet anyway) but I bet it's from the fallout of the last government and the corruption and expenses scandals that dragged our score down.