Poll: Now that's something I havn't seen 50 times before...

Recommended Videos

quack35

New member
Sep 1, 2008
2,197
0
0
Artemis923 said:
quack35 said:
minarri said:
With the exception of Final Fantasy, which is just the same thing over and over again with progressively more girly protagonists, I have no objections to sequels in principle. As long as it's a good game I'll have no qualms about getting it.
Final Fantasy isn't the same thing over and over again. I'm sick of people saying this.

The world, characters, story, battle systems, basically everything is different with each game.

Except for Cid and Moogles.
I'm pretty sure many of those who claim to hate Final Fantasy have never even played one.

You'd be hard pressed to find an RPG that beats FF 1 and 2.
I prefer 5 and 6, myself.
 

Artemis923

New member
Dec 25, 2008
1,496
0
0
quack35 said:
Artemis923 said:
quack35 said:
minarri said:
With the exception of Final Fantasy, which is just the same thing over and over again with progressively more girly protagonists, I have no objections to sequels in principle. As long as it's a good game I'll have no qualms about getting it.
Final Fantasy isn't the same thing over and over again. I'm sick of people saying this.

The world, characters, story, battle systems, basically everything is different with each game.

Except for Cid and Moogles.
I'm pretty sure many of those who claim to hate Final Fantasy have never even played one.

You'd be hard pressed to find an RPG that beats FF 1 and 2.
I prefer 5 and 6, myself.
"YOU SPOONY BARD!"
 

Aesthetical Quietus

New member
Mar 4, 2009
402
0
0
Eh, I'm all for sequels so long as they do them right. Modern Warfare 2 is perhaps my most anticipated game for this year(hoping it does come out this year).
 

Don't taze me bro

New member
Feb 26, 2009
340
0
0
There were some new IPs shown at E3 that looked promising, such as Alan Wake and Brutal Legend. I have to admit though, quite a few sequels listed in the OPs thread I'm looking forward to playing.
 

jonza1

New member
Apr 15, 2009
41
0
0
madbird-valiant said:
jonza1 said:
Halo Reach
Reach is slated for next year, mate. Not this year.

Also, where's the poll option for "I don't give a shit"? I don't care how many sequels there are. If some of them are good games, then fantastic.
Aye carumba D:

Maybe I should of said "Games shown at E3"

but yeah
cheers(Y)
 

savandicus

New member
Jun 5, 2008
664
0
0
I've got nothing against sequels, as long as they either make a crap game not crap or keep the same consistant standard up.

Left 4 dead 2 looks good tbh, since the original badly needs new content so even the same game with new levels would be good.
 

minarri

New member
Dec 31, 2008
693
0
0
quack35 said:
Final Fantasy isn't the same thing over and over again. I'm sick of people saying this.

The world, characters, story, battle systems, basically everything is different with each game.

Except for Cid and Moogles.
Well, I'll exclude the earlier games since the franchise was just getting rolling back then, but from 7 onward I've been growing irritated with many of the character archetypes being recycled (admittedly FF is not the only franchise guilty of this) but also with the entire "down with the man" mentality of the games. While FFX is one of my favorite games, I just can't stomach much more.
 

Ultress

Volcano Girl
Feb 5, 2009
3,377
0
0
I'm excited for FF13 because of my love for Final Fantasy, I may start caring about God of War 3 when the team Ico ame comes out or KH3 is exclusive to the PS3.
 

lordsandro

New member
Aug 6, 2008
137
0
0
jonza1 said:
Anyone paying some interest towards game releases this year will of released the sheer number of sequels released this year.
Now some may think this is a good thing, but I'm really starting to disagree and just wish that they (game developers) would create something new for once in a while.
I mean just from the top of my head here are 14 "new" games to be released this year:

Halo ODST
Halo Reach
Splinter Cell Conviction
Red Steel 2
Final Fantasy 13
God of War 3
Forza 3
Gran Turismo 5
Assassins Creed 2
Left 4 Dead 2
Sims 3
Uncharted 2
Crackdown 2
Metal Gear Solid: Peace Walker

Etc Etc.

Now maybe these games will be good, but i'm fairly sure at least 1/4 of them won't be anything we havn't seen 2, 3 or 13 times already.
And only three of these games will see PC ports (most likely really bad ones).
 

Kermi

Elite Member
Nov 7, 2007
2,538
0
41
Halo ODST isn't really a sequel - it's a brand new campaign, with new characters - set during the events of Halo 2. It's really a spinoff, but there's a lot of originality there.
Halo Reach is more of a prequel but once again, will probably have a new cast of characters and probably won't even really involve Halo itself.
I'd hesitate to call the Sims 3 a sequel since it doesn't have much of a story. It's more like Sims v3.0.

But yes, they are revisiting a lot of existing IPs, because let's face it - these are successful titles and people want more of them.
 

JemJar

New member
Feb 17, 2009
731
0
0
It's easier to get funding to make a game which is innovative in it's own ways as a sequel to an existing and successful franchise: look at Falout 3, it's a new developer who imposed a new viewpoint (arguably changing the genre) and a slew of new facets and features to the franchise.
 
May 17, 2007
879
0
0
I'm ambivalent about it. While it's important to have fresh ideas and new games coming through to keep things interesting, there's also value in evolving what is already there without having to go right back to first draft. With a sequel, you know roughly what to expect, and that can be a good thing.

It's a worse problem when there are too many movie sequels, because narrative is necessarily more important in movies. A game might be narrative-focused, but it doesn't have to be, so a sequel that keeps the story and updates the gameplay is nothing to be ashamed of.
 

Ben Legend

New member
Apr 16, 2009
1,549
0
0
EDIT: Rewording thanks to Headshot Gamer UK shooting my post down. =P

I only count the Dirge of Cerberus and FF X-2 as sequals. Final Fantasy 1-13 in my opinion are stand alone games, due to different characters and different gameplay systems.
 

rosac

New member
Sep 13, 2008
1,205
0
0
webbo619 said:
if the sequal can pull it off then hurayyy for them :D

but i think ones like FFXIII are just not necessary, 13 sequals is WAY too much.
ummm, as mentioned before, final fantasy games are normally totally unrelated. (Notice how FF4 and FF7 are totally different.

rosac
 

Judgedread

New member
Mar 1, 2009
278
0
0
I'm fine with sequels as long as it is not being made just to milk a franchise, an example of that would be halo reach or (arguably) left 4 dead 2.
 

DM.

New member
Mar 27, 2009
762
0
0
If it's a good game I'll buy it even if it's called "this game HEY EVERYBODY IM A PEDO".