zen5887 said:
beastro said:
Only issue I have is playing Islamic factions in historical games like CK2 (does help that their gameplay mechanics are usually different and less enjoyable than others in games like said games Islamic succession laws or having higher corruption and more inept leaders in ETW, etc), no issue with FPSs though.
That's interesting, care to explain why?
I'm unabashedly Euro-centric in such games, the Middle east in a place to conquer, not a place to conquer from, unless you happen to be European as well (My legacy collection at court in CK2 is a mix of Norse, Persians, East Indian and a mix of the three that mingled during my century and a half controlling central Asia and India).
In most games, if they have a Japan I'll play it, but besides that it's European factions.
On top of that is a modern dislike of contemporary ambitions of Islamists that colours things for me growing up over the past few decades. Its closer to home than Pagans, Zoroastrians or Buddhists painting a map fo the Old World in their religion.
And I don't think games like Red Orchestra or Company of Heroes count, because the germans are just a 'team' without any in-game personality or context (which is totally fine for RO and CoH).
Why I don't have a problem playing Islamic factions in FPS or anything else similar to them and I actually preferred playing the Iraqi's in Desert Combat because their vehicles were more interesting and flexible, like using the amphib armour on the BF42 water maps and becoming a little warship.
I think if a game took a Spec Ops: The Line approach to playing the third riech, it could be really interesting.
A developer would have to walk a fine line to keep it from becoming voyeuristic porn where you get to see the atrocities of the Eastern Front played out to sell to giggling idiots who find it amusing.