Poll: Poll: Shall we allow deadly force on a burgular?

[Pimppeter2]

[HEADING=3]The Crown Prosecution Service said it decided to charge him because it believed he used "excessive and gratuitous force".[/HEADING]

Read more: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/2702412/Murder-rap-for-Omari-Roberts-who-knifed-burglar-and-accomplice.html#ixzz0VLbom9RG

Its not like he just found the kid and shot him. He fucking murdered him, excessively.

He killed the scumbag in self-defense. Just because the "Crown Prosecution Service" thinks that was "excessive" doesn't mean it was. It should take a lot more than some dramatic words to convince a sane, law-abiding human being that the victim who simply defended himself was somehow at fault here...

Lets not forget its an investigation, they haven't found him guilty of anything yet. I believe that the Prosecution has reasonable evidence to push this into court. I mean, they don't charge people out of thin air if they don't have any sort of a case. They're not idots.