That has to be a terrible existance...Matthew94 said:Powereaver said:To be viewed for enjoyment purposes only its fine. But it is in NO way a realistic portrayal of sex, plus on a whole gender stereotyping viewpoint it is VERY flawed.
Yeah, a man can't fix the plumbing that fast.
I watch it for the plot.
wait.....porn is illegal places? We should be so lucky!Naeras said:Statistically there's less rape in states where porn is legal, compared to the states where it's not.
captcha: words of wisdom
Same here, except replace wife with boyfriend.Dragonclaw said:My wife and I watch porn together, picked up quite a few "hey, let's try THAT" tricks and it's been a fun and healthy part of our sex life when we use it.
Hey, just because you don't like it doesn't mean you have to ruin it for the rest of us!Schreck157 said:I think that anyone in a serious committed relationship has no need for it either.
Well if there is an outlet to relieve sexual frustration then why wouldn't be helpful. I mean, hasn't it been proven that places where porn is legal have lower sex related crimes? If so then wouldn't the same apply to child porn (CGI or hand drawn of course)? Now granted you're right that this doesn't discourage pedophilic desires and as long as those desires exist there is the chance they will go for the real thing. However, is one's sexual orientation something that can actually be changed?Blablahb said:Not in the case of child pornography, because in the case of pedophiles, you don't want to encourages their sexual thoughts, you want to suppress them altogether or change them to acceptable fantasies.Lucem712 said:That is true.
I think simulated child-porn (Like maybe CGI or something) might be helpful. I mean, it would never compare to the same thing, but I imagine a-lot of people would be able to live with that for fear of being caught and stigmatized by their community.
Therapy for child abusers generally involves gradually shifting their fantasies away from childre, and to acceptable fantasies. If what you claimed was correct, such an approach would never be used for therapy.
Reasoning the other way around, watching child porn keeps pedophilic desires alive and active, and thus increases the risk of committing sex crimes.
The difference here is that unlike most other sexual orientations and preferences, pedophilia can't be practised consensually without doing real harm, by definition. So channeling the desires to prevent crimes out of sexual frustration won't help.
Also, on a side note, the mods take a rather dim view of advocating child porn to any degree. Someone has gotten banned off R&P for saying drawn child porn should be legal for exactly the same reason you just mentioned. Just a bit fair warning.
Actually, I think porn objectifies men more. You see the whole woman, how she writhes in pleasure (Usual sex, not strange shit), while you only see a cock going in and out of her slip-n-slide. That is objectification if anything.Powereaver said:To be viewed for enjoyment purposes only its fine. But it is in NO way a realistic portrayal of sex, plus on a whole gender stereotyping viewpoint it is VERY flawed.
...which don't have addictive qualities beyond that of clubbing, movies or reading a really damn good book.DVS BSTrD said:Wait till you hear about this new thing all the kids seem to be trying these days: they're called videogames!lacktheknack said:Even separating my views from my religion, I'm still very suspicious of activities with actual addictive qualities.
You'd be surprised, see those cases Korea? (and more recently Taiwan). Just a matter of the person involved really, anything can be addictive and perhaps even dangerously so.lacktheknack said:...which don't have addictive qualities beyond that of clubbing, movies or reading a really damn good book.