I believe that makes it "philosophy".Valiance said:...
Logical, yes, important/clever, no.
There are multiple types of atheism, as mentioned previously. One of the more simple divisions you can make is between 'weak atheism' (the absence of belief in a god/gods) and 'strong atheism' (making the concious assertion that there is no god/gods). I'd advise you read a little more around the area before making such broad, sweeping comments.Kubanator said:To the people going on and on about atheism. Atheism is the belief that there is no god. Agnosticism is the uncertainty of a god, strong meaning we will find out, weak meaning we won't, and apathetic meaning they don't care.
Yeah, after all it said Christopher Hitchens after the quote... its called "reading".cuddly_tomato said:Ohhh you were talking about Christopher Hitchens, Peters brother? You are using their little sibling rivalry as a basis for your entire view of the world, the universe, life, love and all things rational and irrational?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Hitchens#On_Morality_and_Religion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Hitchens#Relationship_with_younger_brother
You carry right on listening to which ever one of the brothers floats your boat.
Then you're looking at the effects of a story. The format doesn't matter, what matters who made it. If people made it, then you're going by what people made a long time ago, passing it off as fact, and then studying the effects of it. Theologists mostly spend their time looking at scientific theories trying to find out a way to integrate god into them anyways, they've had 2000 years with the Bible, they've exhausted it.teh_pwning_dude said:Man, I don't even want to picture the social effects of that book. So what about religions that are passed down orally or through practise? Like say for example the Dreaming of the Aboriginals of Australia. They couldn't even write, let alone have a book.
No interest? Well when one quotes either of the Hitchens they are basically quoting what is essentially a snarky little spat between the two brothers. There are some very good reasons to not believe in any form of god. There are some excellent reasons to denounce organized religion and condemn people who try to aggressively push their own religious beliefs and morals onto other people. But nothing Hitchens, either Hitchens, say come under that.Evil Jak said:Yeah, after all it said Christopher Hitchens after the quote... its called "reading".cuddly_tomato said:Ohhh you were talking about Christopher Hitchens, Peters brother? You are using their little sibling rivalry as a basis for your entire view of the world, the universe, life, love and all things rational and irrational?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Hitchens#On_Morality_and_Religion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Hitchens#Relationship_with_younger_brother
You carry right on listening to which ever one of the brothers floats your boat.
Also, nice... a baseless assumption. I have absolutely no interest in his brother. I wasnt even aware his brother existed before you said so, I am not the mans number one fan... wouldnt even say I was in his fan club.
[CITATION NEEDED]Kubanator said:Theologists mostly spend their time looking at scientific theories trying to find out a way to integrate god into them.
Atheists don't believe in god, they believe that people believe in a god, and they believe that belief of god is wrong. It's not really "without god Atheists wouldn't exist" more "without the belief in god Atheists woudn't exist."Lord_Ascendant said:agnosticism is saying "We'll find out eventually" Atheism is saying there is something there to deny. Thus Atheists do believe in God. I blow your mind? If there was nothing to refute, then Atheists wouldn't exist they would just be people.
/bows
Let's assume that Chell = humanity, GlaDos = God and Cake = Heaven.gerrymander61 said:Religion is all about faith. Chell had faith in that the cake existed and wasn't a lie, and in the end was rewarded for her faith in that she left Aperture Science for a better place. If Portal is meant to be compared to religion, then you have it the wrong way around. "The cake is a lie" isn't meant to ridicule the idea of religion, but rather strengthen the ideas of perseverance and faith, two very important parts of religion and human spirituality.
You can find it for much less than that. Around here, you can find them in the local dollar stores (for a dollar, of course). Or you can go to almost any hospital, hotel, or motel and open the drawer in your room. The Gideons place Bibles (or at least New Testaments) almost everywhere, so you can get free Scriptures whenever you want.Kalezian said:I hate to admit it, but the bible is real, you can buy one for about 23.95 at a local bookstore.
If you are happy, that's fine. If you infringe of someone else's rights in the name of your god, it's not fine.teh_pwning_dude said:Then the theologists you know are quite misguided. Of course people made it. Doesn't stop faith from making me feel good. I doubt God will be proved for or against until someone invents time travel, which is just as unlikely as this thread having a satisfying conclusion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creationismcuddly_tomato said:[CITATION NEEDED]Kubanator said:Theologists mostly spend their time looking at scientific theories trying to find out a way to integrate god into them.
Oh, they're an organisation? I thought there was just this one guy called Gideon who was really absent-minded with his Bibles and so had to put his name on them...AdmiralMemo said:The Gideons place Bibles (or at least New Testaments) almost everywhere, so you can get free Scriptures whenever you want.
I think you mean C.S. Lewis thought about it that wayKuchinawa212 said:I always thought of it three ways: Liar, Loony, or Lord. Either it's all a lie and we've been fooled all this time. A few people that were messed up in the head and wrote it all down and thought it was real. Or it is real and we praise him as our lord.
See simple XD
You said "Theologists". Not "Some theologists" or "religious fundamentalists" or any other such qualifier. You just lumped all religious people together and accused them of... well... "mostly spending their time looking at scientific theories trying to find out a way to integrate god into them".Kubanator said:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creationismcuddly_tomato said:[CITATION NEEDED]Kubanator said:Theologists mostly spend their time looking at scientific theories trying to find out a way to integrate god into them.