Poll: Realistic racing games or unrealistic racing games?

Recommended Videos

Robert632

New member
May 11, 2009
3,870
0
0
i like unrealistic racing better cos being a good driver is only one part of it. you also have to see the short cuts which use specific(99.9infininte% of the time is a boost item.) items, allowing the worse driver's to still have a chance.
 

Batadon

New member
Jan 17, 2008
102
0
0
If my vehicle isn't flying over livestock at the speed of sound I'm not having fun.

And the only good thing to come out of Star Wars Episode 1 was the racing game, damn that was a blast...
 

Brnin8

New member
Jul 17, 2009
562
0
0
I like both but I find I prefer the realistic ones because I know the cars, for example Test Drive Unlimited I learned about a lot of new sexy cars but still got drive a Lambo.
 

PxDn Ninja

New member
Jan 30, 2008
839
0
0
I prefer realistic games, but enjoy the real/arcade hybrids as it were as well (NFS for example). I HATE kart racers. Mario Kart is on my list of top 5 worst games of ALL TIME. It is just barely beaten out by Smash Bros.
 

Sonicron

Do the buttwalk!
Mar 11, 2009
5,133
0
0
Unrealistic. All the way.

For me, the most fun I've ever had with any racing game was 'Extreme G III' on the PS2. You don't know what speed is if you've never played it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_ACABAOZhk&feature=related
 

Gaderael

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,549
0
0
I like realistic in the sense of real cars, real track, real damage. The handling can be arcade-like though, that doesn't bother me. I loved the Gran Turismo series. I played the second one for ages.

I really wanted to like GRiD, but the controls for PC left a lot to be desired, along with the other Codemaster offerings. They were way too sensitive, which took the fun out of the game, which is a shame, as the graphics were gorgeous.

I've always like the handling of the cars in the Need For Speed series. It's was just difficult enough to make it a challenge, but not so much that it was just an exercise in frustration. Plus, they offered a lot of customization, which reminded me of Gran Turismo. Hell, I even liked Pro Street.

Not to say I don't like unrealistic games, like Mario Kart, 'cause they're fun too, just not as immersive as the realistic style racing games.
 

Sonicron

Do the buttwalk!
Mar 11, 2009
5,133
0
0
RAKtheUndead said:
Sonicron said:
Unrealistic. All the way.

For me, the most fun I've ever had with any racing game was 'Extreme G III' on the PS2. You don't know what speed is if you've never played it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_ACABAOZhk&feature=related
Pfft. Those corners are so loose that it's more like riding a rollercoaster than a real challenge. None of those games ever seem to have the equivalent of an Istanbul Turn 8.
That's actually what I like about about Extreme G III. You can talk about skill until your tyres catch on fire, but ultimately it's about preferences. I don't like corners such as Turn 8 because I think they break game flow, and racing games should be (in my humble opinion) about speed and flow, both of which the crazy rollercoaster rides of the Extreme G series provide. And maybe I'm just not that great a racer, but the video I provided in my previous post makes the game look easier than it is - the other drivers, long jumps after relatively sharp corners (which can be an instant kill with NO respawn on the track) and generally just maintaining control at speeds of over 999mph pose quite a challenge and keep the game interesting. ^^
 

Jezzascmezza

New member
Aug 18, 2009
2,500
0
0
I really couldn't care about ACTUAL cars, and the way cars handle in games like Forza drive me nuts. If I play a racing game, it has to be one where you've constantly got your finger on the accelerator.
 

TopGearFTW

New member
Jun 10, 2009
8
0
0
RAKtheUndead said:
Realistic [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.115813#2149217], realistic [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.68689#637043], realistic [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.73185#786707], REALISTIC [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/editorials/reviews/5588-Review-GTR-Evolution], REALISTIC. [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/18.105860#1716487]

To me, an avid car fan, realistic driving games are far, far, far, far more exciting than any arcade racing game like Need for Speed, Burnout, Ridge Racer or any kart driving game could ever even begin to be. In an arcade racing game, you just don't get the euphony of a powerful racing engine, the minute details that go into a fast lap of a circuit, the sheer breathtaking speed of a racing car at top speed or those tiny details of handling which make actual automotive racing a supreme challenge.

The challenge is one of my favourite parts of realistic driving games. In an arcade racing game, you don't get massive wheelspin straight off the starting line, proper powerslides which actually take some bloody effort in order to maintain a straight course, the feeling of momentum as you try to brake heavily before a hairpin or any of the great details that go into a realistic racing experience. It gets even more challenging with older cars. The racing simulator, Grand Prix Legends, simulates Formula One cars from the 1967 season, when cars had no downforce, rock-hard bias-ply tyres, fuel tanks that surrounded the driver, and all controlled by men with enough testicular fortitude to face the risks that the insanely powerful cars presented.

Compared to a game like Grand Prix Legends, games like Need for Speed or Burnout are the sole preserve of wimps who can't deal with real cars. Even simulators depicting more modern cars show that it takes a hell of a lot more challenge to drive in realistic games than it does in your arcade sliding-fests. The racing drivers of the past would laugh at you if you find those games challenging. Of course, they'd probably laugh at you if you said that Ninja Gaiden or Battletoads was challenging. Try driving a car at 240 mph down the Hunaudieres, or drive up Eau Rouge in an open-wheel car. That's a real challenge.

P.S. This [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWtCklcYy8s&feature=related] is why real racing is far more exciting than arcade racing. The car in this video reaches about 230 mph down the Hunaudieres straight. That's as fast as a light aircraft, and it's expected to do it for every lap for 24 hours.
Congratulations on having amazing taste, sir.

I'm exactly the same, I love the fact that, for instance, changing the weight distribution by the smallest amount can net you a first place. I love cars and Gran Turismo 4 is still probably the game I have put the most hours in out of any game I have owned, and I haven't played it for over as year.

REALLY looking forward to Gran Turismo 5.
 

TheRightToArmBears

New member
Dec 13, 2008
8,674
0
0
I like both equally. Crash Team Racing is my favorite, but I also love Dirt. I find Gran Turismo too boring, it doesn't give much of a sense of speed.
 

tomtom94

aka "Who?"
May 11, 2009
3,373
0
0
I play both Mario Kart and F1 06 regularly, so I really don't have a preference. I also own Midnight Club 3... I assume that's real?
My favourite racer is probably Lego Racers though, for its sheer simplistic cartoony fun.
 

Laura.

New member
May 30, 2009
560
0
0
As realistic as F-Zero. I like SPEED... so I agree with
Sonicron said:
Unrealistic. All the way.
(stuff about Extreme G III)
etc
Also, BALLISTICS was great back then... the insane speeds you could reach used to blow me away.