Grilled Cheesus said:
And there is a world of difference between thinking about stuff and actually doing it!
And hell, so he buys a weapon, youre telling me that only murderers in the states have weapons? And learning about bombs, I know how to make bombs and thermite and chloroform. I aint never shot up a school.
And I never said that the hypothetical kid was going to either. I merely pointed out that the school should be
concerned at one of their pupils doing those three things in conjunction. Buying a weapon, fine. Reading up on bomb-making techniques, pretty weird but still fine. Obsessively researching school shootings, creepy as fuck but still fine. All three
together, though? You'd have to be a real idiot for that not to set alarm bells ringing.
Grilled Cheesus said:
So tell me, what to you makes it so much different that someone who reads about school shootings is a warning point but those who actually shoot people in a game is okay? Because of the word game? I would be more worried about those enacting school shootings over those just reading articles about it. Else fuck, me reading about WW2 would then make me a nazi but playing a "game" where I did it would be fine right?
You're simplifying again, and ignoring what I said. It is not simply the act of reading about something, in our hypothetical it is the act of
obsessively reasding about a subject while at the same time purchasing materials that would make re-enacting the incident possible. Once again, if that doesn't set off alarm bells for you, then maybe you have the problem here.
Is it OK to do these things in a game? Of course it is. A game is clearly seperated from real life, even when based on true events, whereas the Columbine massacre was very, very real. Obsessing over both is unhealthy, but not so much as attempting to re-enact either. You're trying to boil the point down to make it seem that I've claimed that simply reading about things is cause for concern, but you know that isn't what I said.
To use your nazi example - you reading about WW2 would not make you a nazi. You obsessing over WW2 while buying SS uniforms and lugers off the internet would be a
definite cause for concern. I'm not saying that it definitely means you
are a nazi, but the situatuion certainly warrants closer monitoring, no?
Grilled Cheesus said:
Oh and lets clear up one thing right here and now. Reading about violence means you are fantasizing about violence but playing a game means you are not? Worst. Argument. Ever.
Those who play violent games do indeed fantasize about violence. Otherwise they would not choose to play a game that involves violent content. I read WH40K because I want to read about dudes shooting shit, I play games because I want to play as a dude shooting shit.
That's....well, frankly, that's creepy as all hell. You're saying that the reason you read about Warhammer or play computer games is because you
fantasize about violence? That isn't normal, buddy. The reason I read books where people fight and struggle and die is to enjoy the story, which is why I can equally enjoy a book in which nobody raises a finger towards another person. The reason I play video games with violence in them is to enjoy the game
as a game, which is why I can have as much fun with Tetris as I can shooting dudes on Battlefield. My motivations are not underpinned by some seedy fantasy in which I actually yearn to carry out these acts, and I'm always fully aware that I'm playing a game rather than acting out my own sick desires.
This actually highlights a worry I have - that there really are people who can't seperate the fantasy from the reality, or who utilise the fantasy because they secretly want to do these things in reality.
Grilled Cheesus said:
The basis of your argument seems to boil down to "well everyone knows a game is just a game but reading... thats the real threat"...
And that type of thinking my friends is what makes the technophobes and media protestors of the future.
Whereas your whole argument appears to be "I didn't really understand what you said, so I'm going to simplify it to one ludicrous point and then base my entire rebuttal around it"
This may be worth a read, for next time this happens; [link]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum[/link]