Are there any women who like male nipples, and see them as sexually stimulating? There have to be right? The only thing is is if they are the majority.Woodsey said:Because men find tits sexually attractive...
...duh?
I mean, believe me, if a woman decided to walk around with the old fun bags out then its fine by me, but its pretty obvious why they're not legally allowed in a lot of places.
Only in the same way that some people get turned on by feet.mercifulwrath said:Are there any women who like male nipples, and see them as sexually stimulating? There have to be right? The only thing is is if they are the majority.Woodsey said:Because men find tits sexually attractive...
...duh?
I mean, believe me, if a woman decided to walk around with the old fun bags out then its fine by me, but its pretty obvious why they're not legally allowed in a lot of places.
Not necessarily nipples but I'm sure *plenty* of woman find the male pectoral region attractive and sexually arousing (especially when all muscley and firmmercifulwrath said:Are there any women who like male nipples, and see them as sexually stimulating? There have to be right? The only thing is is if they are the majority.Woodsey said:Because men find tits sexually attractive...
...duh?
I mean, believe me, if a woman decided to walk around with the old fun bags out then its fine by me, but its pretty obvious why they're not legally allowed in a lot of places.
The funny thing is, people would be just as upset a really fat man going topless in public as they would a female.Worgen said:dont make me post a picture of a fat man, Ill do it, Im crazyNinjaDeathSlap said:Men don't have boobs. I thought that would be pretty obvious...
As a man, I feel obligated to second this. Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go beat a giant octopus to death with my bear hands. And that's not a typo.MisterM2402 said:What's so "awful and needs to be covered up" about boobs, eh?NinjaDeathSlap said:Men don't have boobs. I thought that would be pretty obvious...
Very valid point. But then, you could still have that secret awesomeness while making men cover up - the gender bias is still removed.Custard_Angel said:Boobs rock, but they wouldn't be so special if they weren't covered up for special occasions.
A man's body isn't nearly as appealing as a woman's body.MisterM2402 said:Very valid point. But then, you could still have that secret awesomeness while making men cover up - the gender bias is still removed.Custard_Angel said:Boobs rock, but they wouldn't be so special if they weren't covered up for special occasions.
I'm a gay man and I don't particularly care at all about attractive women, and think men are much more appealing than women. Most of the gay men I know find vaginas kind of gross, actually.Custard_Angel said:A man's body isn't nearly as appealing as a woman's body.
Sexual preference regardless, everybody likes seeing an attractive female. Straight women, gay women, straight men and gay men all appreciate an attractive woman, but the same cannot be said for an attractive man.
Some call it gender bias, I call it "who the fuck cares, its the way things are".
you see it depends on the society. What is considered differnt or bad in that respect is a socially constructed thing, some countries women are bare breasted. In our country its normal for guys not to wear shirts and for girls to wear shirts. Personally i wish it was the other way around.MisterM2402 said:Why is it that it's more acceptable for public displays of male semi-nudity (i.e. topless) than for females? You see it everywhere: ads for fragrances, at the beach, on a hot day, on TV, in movies, etc. Men can just walk around with their t-shirts off, bare chested, and nobody cares; if a woman did the same, parents would be averting their children's eyes, media companies would be barraged with complaints and she'd be made to put clothes on or, laws permitting, even arrested (Can the police do that? It sounds plausible.).
Obviously, there are plenty of nude woman in more adult films and on Page 3 of the Sun, but male toplessness is a lot more common and a lot less frowned upon - why is that? When it comes to below-the-belt nudity, it's a different story; fully naked males and females are both a bit "taboo", if you know what I mean. What's so different about the other half?
EDIT: Another point I'd like to make - if you see topless women in magazines (like candid celebrity photos or whatever), only the nipples will be censored, usually with little stars. Men have nipples too, right? So it's obviously not the fleshy, breast tissue that's the "problem", it's the nipples - this makes less sense because the breast tissue is the only thing different between men's and women's chests (please correct me if I'm wrong).