King of the Sandbox said:
manaman said:
They have already been trying to differentiate regular cellphones from the mobile wonder devices by calling them Smartphones.
It doesn't seem to be catching well since nobody has mentioned this yet.
That's because it still has phone in it, and giving just one app of the product as the name is well, imo... kinda stupid.
The major function and the only one they all do universally well (except possibly the iPhone and a couple of blackberrys) is the normal phone crap. Messages, and voice calls. On most phones everything else feels a bit tacked on.
Sure some things shine on some phones. I will give the iPhone credit, it does have a shiny interface, but the camera sucks, most of the apps are just gimmicks, the browser is laggy and when I checked it out crash prone when you tried to view full sites (not mobile versions) it can't replace a computer, it's not an efficient game system.
Most people only use the camera, media players, and game on their phones because they always have the device with them, as stand alone device designed to do the same functions do them many times better.
You might not use the phone as often anymore, but that is still what the device is: A phone with stuff attached. Historically devices that worked the other way around have failed. Check out the Nokia game system that was also a phone if you want an example.
Now that trend is changing as they are able to shove fancier pieces of electronics into your hand. The next few years or so may just see more media oriented devices that also have phone functions, but until they can build out a simple board that houses everything you need for the phone operation on the network in a fairly standardized package then you are going to have the devices be phones first, with everything designed around that.