I was under the impression both persons had to consent to it. Paperwork maybe?emeraldrafael said:I think we had a thread like this a while ago.
Anyway, On topic, No. No, because think about it. How many people will challenge others to duels, the person wont want to, and then its basically just murder cause one person had a level head.
Not necessarily. Alexander Hamilton was killed in a Duel with Aaron Burr because Hamilton showed up to say he wouldnt duel, and Burr just shot Hamilton pretty much cold blood.RedEyesBlackGamer said:I was under the impression both persons had to consent to it. Paperwork maybe?emeraldrafael said:I think we had a thread like this a while ago.
Anyway, On topic, No. No, because think about it. How many people will challenge others to duels, the person wont want to, and then its basically just murder cause one person had a level head.
I was talking about how modern dueling could work. And yes, the way we lost one of America's greatest financial minds sucked.emeraldrafael said:Not necessarily. Alexander Hamilton was killed in a Duel with Aaron Burr because Hamilton showed up to say he wouldnt duel, and Burr just shot Hamilton pretty much cold blood.RedEyesBlackGamer said:I was under the impression both persons had to consent to it. Paperwork maybe?emeraldrafael said:I think we had a thread like this a while ago.
Anyway, On topic, No. No, because think about it. How many people will challenge others to duels, the person wont want to, and then its basically just murder cause one person had a level head.
No it was a fair duel.There was a crowd of spectators too.emeraldrafael said:Not necessarily. Alexander Hamilton was killed in a Duel with Aaron Burr because Hamilton showed up to say he wouldnt duel, and Burr just shot Hamilton pretty much cold blood.RedEyesBlackGamer said:I was under the impression both persons had to consent to it. Paperwork maybe?emeraldrafael said:I think we had a thread like this a while ago.
Anyway, On topic, No. No, because think about it. How many people will challenge others to duels, the person wont want to, and then its basically just murder cause one person had a level head.
That's exactly what I was thinking. Unless some sort of formal licensing bureau was developed specifically for the obtaining of licenses and permission to duel. But that would be a silly waste of time. If people want to settle something through violence, they'll do it with or without some license or piece of paper signed by both parties. Giving them a legal route to take just gives prospective murderers one more way to try and make their murder seem legit.trooper6 said:Police Officer: "You shot that guy! You are under arrest."
Thug: "Oh...officer, it was a duel...yeah, that's the ticket. It was totally consensual."
Police Officer: "Do you have any evidence of that?"
Thug's Fellow Gang Members: "We're witnesses! It was totally consenual."
Police Officer: "Well, okay then. Carry on!"
That already exists, they have "unsanctioned" MMA bouts where anyone can enter... it's not pretty, especially when you get a random fat kid vs a professional fighter:Chogg Van Helsing said:Maybe not a duel to the death. Sort of like a fight, but its until the other person gives up. So no continually beating the shit outa ppl once they had lost. Also, no jumping in when the more popular party begins to lose. I hate that shit. And you can't seek revenge on someone when they beat your friend or sibling etc. And no unfair advantage (knives etc).
You can tell I've thought a lot about this.![]()
I voted "no", but I fully support this.fix-the-spade said:Yes.
But lethal weapons are banned.
Paintball Duelling or something humiliating like a whole wet salmon or handbags.
Handbags at dawn would be amazing, pure comedy.