An unproven game that very likely does not have universal appeal? I'm looking forward to it myself, but I don't think it ends anything.slyder35 post=9.70505.697786 said:Little Big Planet. Ends all arguments.
An unproven game that very likely does not have universal appeal? I'm looking forward to it myself, but I don't think it ends anything.slyder35 post=9.70505.697786 said:Little Big Planet. Ends all arguments.
OK I'll counter your counters to my counter-points... (this could go on for a long time and become confusing)Not a Spy post=9.70505.697424 said:time to to counter your counter-points! wheeeee
1)*sigh* I hate the constant fanboy argument that "your console is just pressing dumb buttons" Every video game involves some mundane finger motion, IT'S NOT A VALID POINT!If Pc gaming is just sitting at a desk typing then console gaming is just sitting on a couch swiveling analog sticks.
2) If your a smart shopper and aren't looking to buy an alienware, you can get a nice gaming PC for the same, or less then a console.(I did)
3) this point is sleightly valid, yes most current gen PC games will not work on your average PC, but as I said above it's not that hard or expensive to get a nice gaming rig
if you look around a little.( and while an average PC will look crappier then a ps3, a nice gaming rig can look loads better)
4) Another childish argument,"your console is so nerdy", save it for recess buddy.
...No universal appeal? Dang, I guess Mario caters to a niche market aswell. I also haven't seen a single negative preview for it, with sites such as IGN declaring it a shoo in as an AAA title, so it's 'unproven' in the same way as Gears 2: very very likely to be amazing, but - as with everything - there's a chance it could suck, but it's a small one.Andy Anonymous post=9.70505.698364 said:An unproven game that very likely does not have universal appeal? I'm looking forward to it myself, but I don't think it ends anything.slyder35 post=9.70505.697786 said:Little Big Planet. Ends all arguments.
Your line of thought intrigues me. Please, explain this.Snidenightshade post=9.70505.698426 said:people who have PS3 are wasting their lives i think
...and Uncharted, Ratchet and Clank, Resistance: Fall of Man, Motorstorm... I could go on. The idea of the PS3 having no games is a myth.GuerrillaClock post=9.70505.698473 said:Except for Warhawk and MGS 4 the PS3 offers very little in terms of top quality games
Mind games like Resistance? Shooters like Braid?TommyGun465 post=9.70505.701708 said:I think its a matter of opinion and taste. PS3 games are more Mind games, while most 360 games are "shoot everything and then check if everything is dead. if anything survived,shoot it again".
A mic/features/lag/content.Indigo_Dingo post=9.70505.701732 said:Not flame, just question. Aside from the quality of the people you square off against, what else makes or breaks an online experience?
I put them separate. Example of Feature:In game messaging Example of Content:A movie rental download.Indigo_Dingo post=9.70505.701764 said:?
Aren't features and content the same thing?
Truth is, I have also only found douche-bags in CoD4. No one bothers to talk in Halo 3, only mature people play Vegas and everyone is afraid of the Banhammer in Gears of War so they shut up.Indigo_Dingo post=9.70505.701732 said:If the PsN has better people on average (I've finally met the douchebags - they were on COD4 and they sounded just horrible. I couldn't run forever I guess) why do you say Live is better?
Not flame, just question. Aside from the quality of the people you square off against, what else makes or breaks an online experience?