Poll: Should smoking be made illegal?

Recommended Videos

rainman2203

New member
Oct 22, 2008
534
0
0
When it comes to freedoms like this, money is often the best way to settle it. That's how the drinking age is (almost) universally 21 here in the U.S.- the federal government (which couldn't directly legislate the drinking age) denied transportation funding to states that didn't make the age 21.

Do the same thing with cigarette taxes- crank 'em up. Sin taxes raise revenue and discourage bad behaviors.
 

Shpongled

New member
Apr 21, 2010
330
0
0
AwesomePeanutz said:
I think most smoking should be heavily taxed until it is universally socially unacceptable.

Flapjack94 said:
i'm fine with people smoking weed, but cigarettes are disgusting and you shouldn't smoke them where people can see you. You should be too ashamed. But it is reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeally fun to cough at smokers when running by them
What makes marajuana better than cigarettes? Marajuana is in fact worse for your lungs and overall health than cigarettes are. Big gaping hole in your argument.
Might wanna check your facts there broseph. No cases of solely marijuana related lung cancer have been reported yet, and heavy users of weed show no sign of obstruction within their lungs airways. Obviously inhaling burnt plant matter into your lungs is never healthy, but since marijuana users tend to inhale less smoke in general than tobacco smokers, there's even less chance of problems arising.
 

Iron Mal

New member
Jun 4, 2008
2,749
0
0
If I was to ban one drug out there (any drug I like) then it wouldn't be cigarettes, it would be alchohol (and yes, alchohol is a drug).

As Bill Hicks once said, 'someone get's really loud or violent at a football match, what are they? Drunk'.
 

cricket chirps

New member
Apr 15, 2009
467
0
0
Greyfox105 said:
Maybe smoking shouldn't be made illegal, but anyone who just happens to smoke near people who don't want to be poisoned by that crap should be shot.
That is kinda fair. Free to kill yourself that way, but start to kill others, and we finish killing you immediately.
So no, no ban, just stay the hell away from non-smokers while smoking, unless they go to you.
that is a very funny policy, would looove the see that one at work. *walking down the street* "oh sh!t, that guys smoking!" *pulls out a gun and shoots him* XD histerical. to bad the world isnt a little more funny
 

Flunk

New member
Feb 17, 2008
915
0
0
I live in Canada, where it's already illegal to smoke in public places and cigarettes are heavily taxed. I have to say, it's really stopping people from starting to smoke.

Sure, why not make them totally illegal, I support doing so by raising the legal smoking age by 1 year every year until everyone who can legally smoke is dead.

I find it odd that no one who has argued in favour of cigarettes has raised one reason WHY they should be legal where other similar drugs (some arguably less harmful) are not.
 

uchi mata

New member
Nov 7, 2010
49
0
0
No for the same reason that pot should be legal same with cocaine and meth it's called personal choice. and making something illegal has never stop anyone from doing it. In fact i think making something illegal makes them more taboo and the "rebel" thing to do with pulls more kids into it.
 

llew

New member
Sep 9, 2009
584
0
0
ok my dad smokes but let me just say this: if people should have the choice to smoke themselves to death, does that mean people can cocaine themselves to death? just saying... but i think it should be banned in public places, not altogether (like the government would anyway the money hungry benders) mainly because its very addictive and loads of people would then resort to getting it illegaly and it would just become another reason to fill up already over-crowded prisons
 

Celros2

New member
Oct 19, 2010
1
0
0
Hahaha. Actually, being a smoker, I say make it illegal. Damn prices will go way, way down :).

But in all seriousness for those that think that cigarettes should be taxed more heavily or banned. Why is it the government's place to tell me what to do? Or to even influence that decision? Your taxing me as if I've done something wrong and there is no factual argument you can make to prove that being a smoker is "wrong". I subscribe to the philosophy that government should stay completely out of cultural issues.

And let me tell you there is nothing quite like the relieving feeling of waking up and pulling out the first cigarette of the morning. Thats satisfaction to me.

Also, for those of you who are using alcohol as if its even in the same league as cigarettes should look a little bit closer. Smokers don't kill people in car crashes (unless you of course are smoking while driving, but thats in the same vein as eating while driving), smokers don't inherently get in conflicts, smokers don't inherently LOSE CONTROL. I have complete command over myself when I smoke and unless you drink "1 glass a wine a day" like health class said was good for you, I'm sure you've experienced what its like to not be in control of yourself.

Alcoholism has destroyed my extended family. Drunk driving causes thousands of innocent deaths. Alcohol poisoning kills thousands of people as well. And thats just deaths, if we count all the people that have been injured, cheated on, neglected, and abused due to alcohol I say cigarettes are a much safer and controlled substance in the truest way.

I smoke. I pay the consequences. Period.

(And someone already mentioned it, but the effects of second hand smoke, unless I'm literally blowing it in your face all day isn't as dangerous as people make it seem)
 

Daffy F

New member
Apr 17, 2009
1,713
0
0
AjimboB said:
No, because prohibition doesn't work. Making smoking illegal would be the same as making drinking illegal in the 20s, or making marijuana illegal. All you end up with is more crime, and more people clogging up the criminal justice system with petty offenses.
Precisely. Plus, because it's been legal for so long, you'd have a hard time getting it made illegal.
 

BENZOOKA

This is the most wittiest title
Oct 26, 2009
3,920
0
0
Lots of good points made here. Too many to even quote.

It's a No. I can't quit just yet.
 

Iron Mal

New member
Jun 4, 2008
2,749
0
0
MassiveGeek said:
It would just be a mess if it was banned entirely.

But I am all for banning it in public places, I feel really sick when I smell cigarette smoke. And people aren't very considerate in where they smoke, so.
Oh yeah?

And every time you make a smoker stand out in the rain because they want a cigarette but you don't want them in the same room you're being very inconsiderate to them too (it works both ways, you are not inherantly morally superior because you choose not to smoke, and this is coming from a non-smoker).

Maybe the next time you see someone light up on a rainy day maybe you should be considerate enough to wait outside while they finish.
 

Raineheart

New member
Mar 23, 2009
152
0
0
No, it should not be banned.

I'm a smoker myself, but I never smoke around other people who don't like it, or around kids. It makes me uncomfortable.

And as to the people who are saying "TAX IT, TAX IT MORE" A 20 pack of smokes in Australia costs around $11.75.

Without tax it would be around $3.50. I think it's taxed enough.
 

Scarecrow

New member
Jun 27, 2010
1,930
0
0
I see that there is a lot of anti somkers here, so I'm just going to say this: I don't smoke but I know a lot of people who do.

I think that banning smoking is just stupid because....well do I even need to say why? It should be pretty simple. And would you guys stop tormenting smokers! It's there persnol choise, they don't torment your for drinking or dressing in black or whatever it is that you do. I personly find anti somkers far more annonying then smokers.

And thats my two-cents.
 

nofear220

New member
Apr 29, 2010
366
0
0
AjimboB said:
No, because prohibition doesn't work. Making smoking illegal would be the same as making drinking illegal in the 20s, or making marijuana illegal. All you end up with is more crime, and more people clogging up the criminal justice system with petty offenses.
^^^Take notes people. There should be no prohibition on any drug, hitting organized crime very hard and stimulating the economy at the same time. Companies can produce drugs that could be sold in stores and the government can tax them. Just because Crack would be made legal doesn't mean everyone will go out and smoke crack...
 

Unesh52

New member
May 27, 2010
1,375
0
0
I said yes in public places. My mom has smoked since I've been alive and I hate it. It smells awful and it makes it hard to breath. I don't want to have to deal with it walking into a publix or whatever. Just like I wouldn't want to deal with some guy banging on his guitar in a publix. It would be annoying.

EDIT: And the government shouldn't be allowed to tell me what harm I'm allowed to do to my own body.
 

MassiveGeek

New member
Jan 11, 2009
1,213
0
0
Iron Mal said:
MassiveGeek said:
It would just be a mess if it was banned entirely.

But I am all for banning it in public places, I feel really sick when I smell cigarette smoke. And people aren't very considerate in where they smoke, so.
Oh yeah?

And every time you make a smoker stand out in the rain because they want a cigarette but you don't want them in the same room you're being very inconsiderate to them too (it works both ways, you are not inherantly morally superior because you choose not to smoke, and this is coming from a non-smoker).

Maybe the next time you see someone light up on a rainy day maybe you should be considerate enough to wait outside while they finish.
I'm sorry to dissapoint, I've never forced someone else to stand in the rain because they smoke. That's just rude.

Where did that even come from? Sorry, but when I'm waiting for my train, it would be very nice of the smokers not to light a cigarette in my face when there's plenty of space they can stand on and have a cigarette without forcing me to breathe in the smoke, without having to stand in the rain even.

And did I ever say I was morally superior? My dad smokes, lots of people in my class smoke - I won't ever force them to not do it, but it would be very nice of them not to do it in my face.

And for that matter, what's worse: having to breathe in toxic smoke or standing out in the rain for two minutes? I for that matter wouldn't mind standing in the rain, I think it's refreshing.
 

PedroSteckecilo

Mexican Fugitive
Feb 7, 2008
6,732
0
0
Nah, if people want to smoke it's their own damn business, as long as they don't want to do it around me.
 

JaredXE

New member
Apr 1, 2009
1,378
0
0
Absolutely not. It's a legal product, does not outright kill you, and should be able to be purchased freely by consenting adults.

And I say this as a non-smoker.
 

jackknife402

New member
Aug 25, 2008
319
0
0
Jiraiya72 said:
EcksTeaSea said:
No. If smoking is banned then drinking has to be banned as well.
Drinking doesn't harm your health unless you overdo it. Smoking harms you regardless of amount smoked.
You do know that every drop of alcohol destroys a number of brain cells right? Alcohol is worse than weed man.