Snowy Rainbow said:
NASA and the IAU disagree. See, our moon's name isn't Luna. No. What do NASA, the IAU, Merriam Webster and Oxford recognize as the official name? The Moon. This "Luna" business is an inaccurate bastardization of many different languages and is not even a proper noun.
woah... calm down.
honestly, i dont really care what NASA thinks on this matter. they also say Pluto isnt a planet anymore, but a "dwarf" planet. i dont agree with that, either. i consider it to be a planet, and i consider its small size to be irrelevant. why not say Jupiter is no longer a planet, but a "gargantuan planet"?
it does bring up another point, though. NASA changes their mind on things, over time. i mentioned this before, but you must know what will inevitably happen if the human race branches out to other planets - other planets with their OWN moons. they will have to name those moons, and call Earth's moon something other than simply, "moon". the name they would most likely go with would probably be "Luna"... but until then, sure, we will continue to just call it "The Moon", and you will be happy as a clam for that, im sure.
also, many other cultures gave the moon names before your precious NASA, IAU, Webster, and Oxford ever existed. therefore, there are many names for the moon. and none of them have to be proper nouns. know why? because its a name. when you name something, you can name it whatever the hell you want, you can MAKE UP a word. if i were to discover a planet someday, i would probably name it Psstgkitillia or something ridiculous like that, just to irritate people like yourself.
btw, my friends last name is Luna, and i dont think hes upset because his name isnt a proper noun. (because it really doesnt matter)