Many of Bond's original class signifiers have faded over the years, too.Susan Arendt said:For folks citing Bond's womanizing as one of his immutable traits, had you not noticed how drastically that part of his personality got toned down after AIDS became a worldwide epidemic? The producers felt that it was inappropriate and irresponsible for Bond to be shagging everyone that would stay still long enough in the new social climate. So the character changed, despite his ladykilling ways being part of Fleming's original vision.
GO SEAN CONNERY!!!!Amnestic said:Pierce Brosnan is Irish, Ireland notably not being part of Great Britain. Scotland however is part of Great Britain, so I'm not quite sure how it's ironic that Sean Connery was supposedly the best Bond.But James Bond is British, white and played best by Sean Connery (Which is Ironic due to the british thing). He always has been.
Not this type of saintAuntyEthel said:Err... there is a black saint. He's called Moses the black.freakyHippo said:I think we are years away from seeing a black bond. In this country we don't have any other black people in top spying positions. Until we have a black Man from U.N.C.L.E or a black Saint i don't think we'll ever see a black bond.
++++++++++++++++++++UsefulPlayer 1 said:No.
Its not a racial thing, but that would put up making Bond Asian, South American, or Indian.
The man is white, that was the way it was when that character was created and I think it should just stay that way.
Otherwise it wouldn't be James Bond, but another savy agent.
I'm with you on the British thing, but I'd pay to see a great lady-Bond. Jane Bond or something.Susan Arendt said:Personally, I think it would be fine, so long as he stays male and British. Those are the only two aspects of the character I believe to be sacrosanct.