Elcarsh said:
AntiChri5 said:
Yes, because having mildly racist troops during a nationalistic war is exactly the same as wanting to wipe out an entire race and killing six million innocents.
The Stormcloaks are not Nazis in any way shape or form, they are treating elves better then America and Australia treated German and Japanese citizens during WW2. Not to mention that the Nazis were aggressors, invading other countries while the Stormcloaks have only fought in Skyrim, and are fighting against a group that considers them a lesser species and wants to wipe them out.
I'm curious, what would you call what they did to the men of the Reach, AKA the Forsworn? Was that just self-defence, or something?
You mean the original conquering, centuries ago? Or putting down the recent rebellion?
For the first, that is just the way civilisations have worked for as long as they have existed. No, it was not a good thing but it is so long in the past that that ship has sailed and fighting it is pointless. Every civilisation that exists today has conquered other civilisations. America is a prime example. Should native Americans rebel and execute the current administration because their land was taken from them hundreds of years ago?
If you are talking about the rebellion, then yes putting down rebellions is self defence, particularly when the people rebelling worship Hagravens.