Yopaz said:BiscuitTrouser said:But some are not :3 Im pretty confident nitroglycerin isnt toxic immediately. All im saying is if they are aware the only test is to drink it thats easily bypassed.Yopaz said:You know, most explosives are highly toxic. Consuming even small amounts could cause them to vomit blood. Yes, suicide bombers could probably take that risk because they wouldn't care about getting sick. It's not like they're planning to live it through anyway, that's true. However if they were to drink something that would make them them deadly sick and cause them to lose the skin inside their mouth don't you think that would be enough to tip us off that they are not carrying water?
Oh, you also conveniently ignored the part where I said that I wasn't saying that there was no danger danger in letting us bring water. You ignored the part where I said a knife can be used as a murder weapon, you ignored that I mentioned it can be used to make a bomb. Tell me how a knife is less dangerous than a bottle of water. Because that's the point I am trying to make here.
I didnt address those because i agree. A knife is way more dangerous.
The points i disputed were these two, everything else we agreed on:
Tasting was a useful test in any way shape or form.
Testing the liquid would be easy or more efficient.
The rest isnt relevent to what i wanted to say. We agree.Nitrglycerin is lethal in doses higher than 200mg-1200mg so it is classified as highly toxic even though it is used as heart medication. In fact a lot of medicines are highly toxic.x EvilErmine x said:WTF?...Why are you even bring a knife on a plain in the first place? What's that all about? What possible use would you have for a blade while on a flight?
If you absolutely need a knife where you are going then check that shit in with your luggage and and declare it with customs.
Oh and btw, anyone who says a 6cm blade isn't really that dangerous is talking out of their arse. Anything with an sharp edge can be deadly in the right hands (or should that be wrong hands?).
EDIT
It's not toxic, it's actually sometimes used to treat Angina as it can promote vasodilation and increase blood flow.
In cases of high exposure (such as industrial exposure from demolition explosive) then it can cause intense headaches, a condition known as 'bang head' lolz
However I will agree that neither tasting or chemical testing are good solutions. I just find airport security in general to be stupid and that it's a step in a stupider direction when they suddenly will allow knives.
I guess you're only allowed to bring objects which aren't blunt, but are made of a material that can't effectively be "sharp". So you're only allowed objects which are in sharp shapes, but made out of foam.MeChaNiZ3D said:Actually though, something I find hilarious whenever I go to an airport: the signs telling you what you can't bring on the plane start with "Sharp objects", and then "blunt objects", which begs the question: What manner of object ARE you allowed to bring?
How do you make a bomb with just a knife?Yopaz said:And knives can be used to stab and kill someone. With a 6cm blade I could even use it to make a bomb.
someone should make a game outta that, dog-fighting planes where you use medieval siege weaponry strapped to your aircraft, maybe even some broadsword boarding action in mid-air.thaluikhain said:Well, how would they feel if they didn't ban them, and a terrorist brought down a plane with a trebuchet?Soviet Steve said:I was flying last summer and while in Holland I had the chance to close-read one of the posters that announced what wasn't allowed on a plane. Amongst them were catapults and ballistas.![]()
Cap: bark ing mad
Yeah, like that.
I might be wrong, but I don't think the problem is with those things, but rather liquid/paste/gel explosive compounds could easily be disguised as those things.Yopaz said:Shouldn't the insane rulings start by removing the insane rulings rather than those who can be justified? Sure a 6cm knife wont be enough to hijack the plane or kill a lot of people, but you could stir up some hell. However a bottle of water, a tube of toothpaste, jam, perfume or moisturizer is strictly prohibited.
Yes it can, but a knife can pose even more of a threat, even a small one.Binnsyboy said:I might be wrong, but I don't think the problem is with those things, but rather liquid/paste/gel explosive compounds could easily be disguised as those things.Yopaz said:Shouldn't the insane rulings start by removing the insane rulings rather than those who can be justified? Sure a 6cm knife wont be enough to hijack the plane or kill a lot of people, but you could stir up some hell. However a bottle of water, a tube of toothpaste, jam, perfume or moisturizer is strictly prohibited.
OT: Cool, I'm a habitual swiss army knife carrier. Although I'm English, and thus subject to British airport security. Damn.
All it takes is a little chemistry using only the knife and things you're allowed to bring or things they actually give you on the plane. That's all I am willing to share.Duncan Belfast said:How do you make a bomb with just a knife?Yopaz said:And knives can be used to stab and kill someone. With a 6cm blade I could even use it to make a bomb.
6 cm is still larger than the standard boxcutter blade. They used boxcutters to hijack planes on 9-11.Yopaz said:Sure a 6cm knife wont be enough to hijack the plane or kill a lot of people
This has always been one of the major reasons i have a hard time accepting the official story of what happened aboard the 9-11 flights. I mean seriously, box cutters?! Those are no more dangerous than what the TSA is now allowing with these knives. Yet i'm supposed to believe that it was enough for 6 people to overcome an entire plane full of people, let alone 2 planes. I'm not saying i'm a truther that believes the government was involved(I don't dismiss the theory either), but its just a rather hard version of events to accept.derelict said:Eh, knives are only as dangerous as the people wielding them. Same for guns I suppose, though it is easier to use a gun. I'm not sure I'm alright with a bunch of excitable and generally useless people getting hero complex on a cramped aircraft because they think their 2 inch implement is a useful force multiplier, but it may help discourage future assailants from taking the chance in the first place.
6 cm is 2 and a third inches. Second, a knife with these characteristics isn't a knife, it's a paperweight/letter-opener. I wouldn't even use such a crappy knife to cut boxes at work.Dirty Hipsters said:So starting April 25th of this year (that's next week) the TSA is going to start letting people carry small pocket knives on planes again. The selection of knives you can bring is rather limited, you can only bring folding knives that have a blade length of less than 6 cm, a blade width of less than half an inch. No fixed blade knives, no molded grips, and no locking blades will be allowed on any of the knives.
Considering these rules, will any of you be taking pocket knives on board any flights in the future? If so what kind of pocket knives are you bringing?
Personally, I think it's a really dumb decision to allow knives on planes again, but considering that they are allowing it I would love to bring one (since I'm one of those people that always carries one on him anyway). Problem is, I don't have a single knife that fits all these characteristics. Most of my folding knives either have liner or frame locks, and even the ones that don't tend to have blades longer than 2.5 inches (a hair over 6cm). Even the smallest knife I have, a spyderco grasshopper, wouldn't be allowed on a plane because the blade is wider than 1/2 an inch.
edit: For those asking why someone would even NEED a knife on a plane in the first place, my response is that you don't necessarily need the knife on the plane. The thing is that many people don't like checking their bags, so they prefer to fly with nothing but carry on baggage (I'm one of those people). For those people who like to have an everyday carry knife with them it's nice to actually have the option to bring it on their trip without having to check their luggage. It has little to do with having a knife on the plane, and more to do with having their knife available to them at their destination without having to entrust the airline with their baggage.
Why thank you for quoting me entirely out of context. I know this is your thing so I am not surprised though. After spending so much time explaining why carrying a small blade can be so dangerous it's really nice to be informed that they can be dangerous.Zachary Amaranth said:6 cm is still larger than the standard boxcutter blade. They used boxcutters to hijack planes on 9-11.Yopaz said:Sure a 6cm knife wont be enough to hijack the plane or kill a lot of people
Bad example?
I know people are all hasty to try and justify less safety, but still.