Poll: Star Wars - the correct order?

Recommended Videos

Conza

New member
Nov 7, 2010
951
0
0
Saelune said:
4-6 first then 1-3. The first 3 seem to want to explain why 4-6 happened how it did, as opposed to 4-6 showing the continued events from 1-3.
Yep, I second that, good description, I typically watch 1-6 instead of 4-3 (think about it), but the latter is the way they were released in rl, and the older 3 kick the crap out of the newer ones, the newer ones kinda just pay homage as well.
 

Blow_Pop

Supreme Evil Overlord
Jan 21, 2009
4,863
0
0
4-6 then 1-3. It is the only order I will watch them in....


Though 4-6 I do tend to watch in random order from time to time. But if its someone new to Star Wars then in order, 4-6 and 1-3
 

OrenjiJusu

New member
Mar 24, 2009
296
0
0
4-6, 1-3. Ps. avoid Extended universe material, a lot of it does not make sense/goes against characters established motivations (e.g. luke joining the dark side at one point)
 

varulfic

New member
Jul 12, 2008
978
0
0
Watch the old movies first. They are the classics, they are the good ones and the only ones that matter. The old trilogy is one of those film series that everyone should have seen. Nobody cares if you haven't seen the prequels, in fact you are just better off. You're not gonna make her a fan of the series by forcing her to sit through the new ones. In fact, your girlfriend will most likely leave you if you try to make her watch more after Attack of the Clones.

Seriously. Just skip the prequels, they are awful movies. Not just awful Star Wars movies, not just failing to live up to the hype and legacy. They stand alone as true crappy films. Unless you are the kind that likes to nitpick horrible movies while watching them, just skip em.
 

2xDouble

New member
Mar 15, 2010
2,310
0
0
Definitely watch the original 3 first. Every twist in the original series is completely spoiled in the early movies, and every bit of foreshadowing in the prequel trilogy assumes basic knowledge of the originals. They were intended for and are best in that order: A New Hope, The Empire Strikes Back, Return of the Jedi, The Phantom Menace, Attack of the Clones, Revenge of the Sith.
 

C117

New member
Aug 14, 2009
1,331
0
0
4-6, then 1-3 if you feel like it. And always remember: Han shot first.
 

badgersprite

[--SYSTEM ERROR--]
Sep 22, 2009
3,820
0
0
Saelune said:
4-6 first then 1-3. The first 3 seem to want to explain why 4-6 happened how it did, as opposed to 4-6 showing the continued events from 1-3.
Yeah, this. Besides, the prequels have massive plot holes and discontinuity with the original trilogy, such that it actually makes it more confusing if you see those first.
 

Jarlaxl

New member
Oct 14, 2010
152
0
0
Zorak the Mantis said:
4-5-Holiday Special-6-1-2-3
I love you so much for this.

I detected a few people in support of the New Trilogy...well, they have something resembling a point to defend.

The New Trilogy had to accomplish two things, really:

One, Palpatine had to be made out to be a scheming, manipulative Machiavellian bastard.

Two, Anakin --> Vader had to make sense.

Astonishingly, I think that the story itself was a success - as a character, Palpatine was utterly corrupt and was fantastic at manipulating everyone around him to do what he needed. As for Anakin, a love interest actually makes total sense for his fall to the Dark Side - he's a victim of his emotions, and shows just how hard being a Jedi is when the Dark Side is so appealing to one's, well, humanity.

The trouble is the storytelling. I had an English teacher who said that storytelling is everything. Tell a ghost story well, you have Hamlet. Tell it poorly, you have Scooby Doo. And those movies are poorly, poorly written.

It's a pity - the New Trilogy really could have worked.

Edit: To clarify, everything else in the New Trilogy which fails to satisfy these two points is superfluous - Naboo, Jar Jar, the Clone Wars, podracing, Yoda lightsaber fights, the cameo of the droids and Chewie - if they had been used effectively towards either of the other 2 ends, that would have been one thing, but they rarely were anything more than OH HAY REMEMBER THIS THING WE DID?

This review series helps shed some light on why the new trilogy simply isn't up to snuff: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxKtZmQgxrI
 
Mar 30, 2010
3,785
0
0
Go with the originals first, otherwise the whole "Luke, I am your father" scene loses all impact. And please try to go for the original originals, rather than the remastered originals. Han shot first dammit.
 

Canadamus Prime

Robot in Disguise
Jun 17, 2009
14,334
0
0
I would say just go with chronological order. That way her mind won't be tainted with the nonsense that other Star Wars fans are. "Waaaaaaaaaaaah, the originals were better! The prequels suck! I'm a whiny *****! Waaaaaaaaaaah!"
 

chronicfc

New member
Jun 1, 2011
328
0
0
Order of make, as the "Luke I am Your Father" scene works better if you think Darth V is nothing but an evil robot, as I did at the time, also the Leia twist (being the sister) is ruined if you watch the prequels
 

Smertnik

New member
Apr 5, 2010
1,172
0
0
The correct order: IV, V, VI.

The new trilogy is ranging from mediocre to subpar. There's no overarching protagonist, the characters and the story often don't make any sense, there're far too many unneeded action sequences.. I could go on and on.
That's not to say the original trilogy is perfect. But it sure is superior to the new one in most possible ways.

But some people seem to like those movies, so I guess your gf could be one of them? In any case, I'd definitely recommend watching SW films in the order they have been made. The new trilogy spoils some important stuff and partially cheapens characters, especially Vader and Kenobi. I definitely wouldn't have liked them as much as I did if I knew beforehand that one was a whiny idiot and the other a hypocrite.
 

MASTACHIEFPWN

Will fight you and lose
Mar 27, 2010
2,279
0
0
Watch 4-6, but in 5, when he says NO LUKE, I AM YOUR FATHER, put in 3. go back to 5. but nearing the end of six, where darth is about to throw the emperor- STOP (Hammer time) put in the disk for episode one, then back to 6, and when darth is about to die, put in 2.

Confusing enough? I hope so.
 

Stalydan

New member
Mar 18, 2011
510
0
0
4 to 6 and then 1 to 3. Really the prequels were only made to show how Darth Vader became who he was.
 

Cerrax

New member
Feb 15, 2009
164
0
0
The Special Editions of Episodes 4, 5, and 6 are just awkward. The new special effects right alongside the old ones just looks weird and obvious. And there's a lot of scenes and little details that are not in the original movies. Usually this is a good thing, but in the case of George Lucas, it's not at all. The scene with Han and Jabba by the Falcon is one of the most awkward and horribly made scenes ever, in any movie. Just, avoid the Special Edition at all cost if you can.