Zorak the Mantis said:
4-5-Holiday Special-6-1-2-3
I love you so much for this.
I detected a few people in support of the New Trilogy...well, they have something resembling a point to defend.
The New Trilogy had to accomplish two things, really:
One, Palpatine had to be made out to be a scheming, manipulative Machiavellian bastard.
Two, Anakin --> Vader had to make sense.
Astonishingly, I think that the story itself was a success - as a character, Palpatine was utterly corrupt and was fantastic at manipulating everyone around him to do what he needed. As for Anakin, a love interest actually makes total sense for his fall to the Dark Side - he's a victim of his emotions, and shows just how hard being a Jedi is when the Dark Side is so appealing to one's, well, humanity.
The trouble is the storytelling. I had an English teacher who said that storytelling is everything. Tell a ghost story well, you have Hamlet. Tell it poorly, you have Scooby Doo. And those movies are poorly, poorly written.
It's a pity - the New Trilogy really could have worked.
Edit: To clarify, everything else in the New Trilogy which fails to satisfy these two points is superfluous - Naboo, Jar Jar, the Clone Wars, podracing, Yoda lightsaber fights, the cameo of the droids and Chewie - if they had been used effectively towards either of the other 2 ends, that would have been one thing, but they rarely were anything more than OH HAY REMEMBER THIS THING WE DID?
This review series helps shed some light on why the new trilogy simply isn't up to snuff: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxKtZmQgxrI