Banok said:
fallout 3 is better than oblivion, but basically the same game. its like saying brawl is better than mele, you played mele first and they are 99% identicle anyway! so how could you prefer the later game unless you where retarded enough to miss out on the first??!?
voted oblivion. anyone who disagrees with me is a fool! I'm not being biased either I love mass effect too, but its a linear game that lasts about 5 hours gameplay, how could you compare it to a sandbox game that you can invest weeks into, and do things like explore and not just listen to diaglog?
You're a douchebag. Mass Effect took me about 25 hours, just for the story alone, and roughly 90 hours to finish all sidequests and explore all the worlds, so the fact that you finished it in 5 hours leads me to believe you're an idiot, who didn't bother finishing the game.
Also, Fallout 3 (not as good as the previous ones) was far superiour to Oblivion in gameplay, the concept, the voice actiing (FAR superiour to Oblivion),the world, and the story (especially the story).
I finished Oblivion (all the sidequests and main quests, took me about 120 hours) JUST so I could say to people like you that it's such a boring game. Sure it's a massive sandbox, but compared to fallout 3, its big and empty. You have to walk miles to get anywhere. There's no way of knowing whether the monster in front of you is going to kick your arse or not, the quest map and system was really cumbersome and the battle interface was tacky and annoying, very slow to respond and just overall awkward. The only remotely interesting quest that I'll admit kept me playing was Knights of the Nine. Everything else, I kept hoping would be as good as KoTN, but it wasn't. Sure Fallout3 to me felt like Oblivion with guns, but I actually had fun playing Fallout3.
Also, it's spelt Melee! -.-