Ah, that's the thing. It's not a test to determine optimism / pessimism. It's slightly deeper and less interesting than that. Has more to do about finding out which part of a person's brain is dominant, as well as test emotional links to descision making, and a few other things. Overall, it's incredibly boring.PatientGrasshopper said:I think it is meant to test weather you are an optimist or a pessimist, but what if you are a realist? Hence the yes answer.Jaythulhu said:To be honest, the whole glass half-full/empty thing is not designed to test what the majority use it for (including the OP). I'll dig up my old psyche textbooks to give ya the correct use of this test after work, if any are interested.
...You just blew my mind.Xanadu84 said:Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
The egg, which turned into a chicken. The egg was laid by an animal that was remarkably similar, but genetically not quite, a chicken.
The chicken came first. The egg is only a potential chicken.Xanadu84 said:Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
The egg, which turned into a chicken. The egg was laid by an animal that was remarkably similar, but genetically not quite, a chicken.
No more crack for you!Ronwue said:Actually the glass is neither full nor empty. It is a perception of a collective entity by an entity experiencing itself subjectively with no limits in life and not restricted by time. In short the glass does not exist so it cannot be either half full or half empty.