Poll: The End Justifies The Means...

Recommended Videos

j0z

New member
Apr 23, 2009
1,762
0
0
NoMoreSanity said:
Always. If killing one person saves 10, I'd do it. If performing horrible medical procedures on a few people so thousands can live better lives, I'd do it. If I was to die in some way so many more would live, I'd be comfortable with it.
I agree, if total good outweighs total bad, then yes it is justifiable.
 

XJ-0461

New member
Mar 9, 2009
4,513
0
0
It depends on the ends and the means. For example, I wouldn't be willing to impliment the HIV "solution" presented in the OP, but I would be willing to kill a madman threatening to kill everyone in a bus.

Basically, you need to judge every situation individually.
 

Internet Kraken

Animalia Mollusca Cephalopada
Mar 18, 2009
6,915
0
0
Sparrow said:
The end always justifies the means for those that don't qualify as "the end".
Exactly. If you were going to be the one to die, I doubt you would approve of this.


Which is exactly why I believe the ends never justify the means.
 

Xorghul

New member
Jul 2, 2008
728
0
0
I think it'd be more interesting to think we humans have HIV because someone had sex with a baboon.
 

lwm3398

New member
Apr 15, 2009
2,896
0
0
IHaveNoCoolness said:
Dropping a nuclear bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended WWII, but it killed thousands of civilians, but saved the lives of many soldiers. Does that make killing non-combatants okay because you're protecting your own soldiers?
Hey, some Japanese soldiers were saved too.

They didn't Kamikaze because they wanted to, or because they were all that patriotic, they were given enough gas to get the and crash. They probably jumped for joy at hearing they wouldn't have to fly.
 

lwm3398

New member
Apr 15, 2009
2,896
0
0
Xorghul said:
I think it'd be more interesting to think we humans have HIV because someone had sex with a baboon.
I thought it had something to do with us using their shelters and it spread on to us.
 

thepj

New member
Aug 15, 2009
565
0
0
this is the thing about humans, they claim to be logical but when it comes right down to it the fact that logic has no moral code ends up fucking up this claim and giving us no commen sence at all
 

crudus

New member
Oct 20, 2008
4,415
0
0
Few people are willing to do what needs to be done. History does not think so.

Pendragon9 said:
No. The ends never justify the means.
counter example: helping any number of people at the sacrifice of yourself or your comforts/needs.
 

Xorghul

New member
Jul 2, 2008
728
0
0
lwm3398 said:
Xorghul said:
I think it'd be more interesting to think we humans have HIV because someone had sex with a baboon.
I thought it had something to do with us using their shelters and it spread on to us.
I said, I think it'd be more interesting if humans have HIV because someone had sex with a baboon.
OK?(^_^)
 

Skeleon

New member
Nov 2, 2007
5,410
0
0
lwm3398 said:
Xorghul said:
I think it'd be more interesting to think we humans have HIV because someone had sex with a baboon.
I thought it had something to do with us using their shelters and it spread on to us.
The current theory is that it stems from hunting and eating monkey flesh.
 

Haunted Serenity

New member
Jul 18, 2009
983
0
0
lwm3398 said:
Haunted Serenity said:
There may be no cure ever but there may be better preventive medications
Or perhaps people will wise up already.
Rape? don't know how that can be wised up. some people see the need to spread their affliction amongst the world because they have been sentenced to death by it
 

Ace of Spades

New member
Jul 12, 2008
3,303
0
0
Depends on how bad the means are. If you perform a lesser evil for a greater good, then yes. If you perform a great evil disguising it with good intentions, then no.
 

klakkat

New member
May 24, 2008
825
0
0
Since I can't put it any better, I will use a quote:

??The ends justify the means? is the coward?s way of saying ?I know it?s wrong but I did it anyway and don?t want to face the consequences.? -R.K. Milholland

In short, if you commit a crime, you are liable for it no matter the outcome. The "self defense" aspect being the only reasonable exception.