Cody211282 said:
Ok I will change my main point to "they are defective mining tools and even if you kill every last one you can still remake them because you have the blue prints"
This is true.
Unfortunately, even if you were to do so, you've already completely destroyed the species and created something entirely new. Even if you built new bodies, they'd be populated by completely different personalities.
What you're saying is the equivalent of "Lots of people have sex, so it's fine to kill people".
MasochisticMuse said:
Okay, so it's not right for me to choose the genocide of the Geth over the Quarians. Does that mean it's okay for you to choose the genocide of the Quarians over the Geth? No. They're both valid factions who deserve the right to exist, but the point of this poll is to choose one or the other. I understand you have your reasons for picking the Geth over the Quarians, but don't act like I'm some Nazi Hitler just because I made the opposite choice. We're doing the exact same thing.
It's not. All I have said in this thread is that the Geth are morally in the right. I wouldn't side with anyone that wanted to exterminate either side.
Hurr Durr Derp said:
I don't agree with your assessment that humans are 'constructed' in a way that is not significantly different from the way machines are constructed. Robots are just mechanical parts put together, while humans are born from genetic information, grow and evolve in a natural way. The human body doesn't construct babies like a factory constructs robots.
Whether or not the Geth have an analogy to human emotions is not really relevant, since it would just be a part of the original glitch in their design that gave them their advanced reasoning abilities.
About your side note, that's a bit of a gray area for sure (the legal ramifications alone wound be a nightmare, let alone the philosophical ones), but entirely irrelevant since the Geth were never alive to begin with.
Yes, humans are certainly grown in a natural process. However, they may as well be put together by a robot. It's a rigidly defined process that every human goes through, regardless of the differences in source material.
The
only difference between natural growth and construction is the source material.
Also, by your logic, any artificially created human (like say, clones with altered DNA) are then inherently inferior. They're built, so by your logic they must not be human.
Hurr Durr Derp said:
Except that African people are undeniably living, breathing humans. The Geth undeniably aren't. While the idea that they were made to serve was just a convenient excuse in the case of black slaves, it's a hard fact in the case of Geth drones.
And what is the point of ignoring the "Geth are robots" argument when that's at the very core of the discussion? That's like telling someone to argue that killing Jews is wrong without mentioning that Jews are human beings.
Because "because they're robots" is, by its very nature, invalid. The Geth exhibit all the symptoms of consciousness. They are self-aware, capable of a range of emotions, and very capable of independent thought. The "because they're robots" argument can just as accurately be restated as "they came from somewhere different from us, therefore they are inherently inferior".
We, as a people, have been over that belief thousands of times, and every time it's been proven false.
Hurr Durr Derp said:
Now, for the record, I do think that a peaceful solution would be the best for everyone involved, for both moral and practical reasons. But that's not what the thread is asking. If I had to choose a side, I'd go with the ones that are actual living beings any day.
As Legion himself said, treating the Geth the same way you'd treat organics is a sign of racism and anthropomorphism.
I would agree insofar as peace would be the best option.
I wouldn't support the extermination of either. The only thing I've been trying to say is that the Geth were/are morally in the right.