Poll: Toughest Sport

Recommended Videos

acer840

(Insert Awesome Title)
Mar 24, 2008
353
1
1
Country
Australia
Rugby Union. Watch a game between the All Blacks (New Zealand) and the Wallabies (Australia) and watch how rough it can get on the field. Youtube some of the older games, as the rules and regulations have made it a bit safer... just a bit.
 

emeraldrafael

New member
Jul 17, 2010
8,589
0
0
StBishop said:
Might want to change the poll options to make it opvious that you're talking about Ice Hockey, as over here (Australia) if someone says Hockey they mean Field Hockey.[/quote]

Could be either. I've played deck/field hockey too. And that takes up space, so I just kinda lumped it all together, though no offense was meant.
 

Michael Henrikson

New member
Feb 7, 2011
3
0
0
Foil fencing is ridiculously difficult. Your holding a four foot piece of metal in your hand; trying to stand properly, trying to move while balancing in an unnatural position, moving back and forth with your opponent, parrying incoming attacks and still trying to formulate a plan of action that results in you depressing a point on the weapon with at least 500 grams of force on your opponents chest. Not to mention the rules of right of way. And all this while moving your hand faster than the human eye can see, and another person doing there best to stop you at every turn. Now that is pure difficulty.
 

emeraldrafael

New member
Jul 17, 2010
8,589
0
0
Canid117 said:
emeraldrafael said:
So, as an American (though really, a few of my more international friends have noticed it to), its getting rather tiring to see the argument over whether Rugby or (American) Football is tougher.
Cant Rugby and Football fans unite over a common lack of respect for Soccer instead of going at each others throats?
I somehow doubt so, but thats just me you know. Personally, I dont see the appeal to either, and Soccer just bores me to tears. But then again, I'm a hockey person.

IndianaJonny said:
emeraldrafael said:
You give us far too much credit, chum. Every safety measure possible is taken and you only really put yourself at risk if you're careless or stupid (OK, with the odd equipment failure)- so please don't go round recommending that people try this without supervision or the proper gear; that isn't fencing, it's an accident waiting to happen.
True, but you're still staring down at a weapon. And while every possible measure has been taken, I've seen how bad it can get. Besides, I'm one of those stupid people that does it without the equipment. Like I siad, I find it it a matter of Opinion mostly, but any person that can hoesntly look at it and keep their cool is pretty much laughing at death.

Anyway, I dont think anyone would hoenstly go out and do that, but if you want to call yourself strong and tough, its a good proving ground.

Kair said:
Do not use the term 'Soccer', it is Football.

Use '(American) Football' or 'Handegg' for the sport Handegg, then 'Football' for Football.
Dont tell me how to run my polls, thank you.
 

Pillypill

New member
Aug 7, 2009
506
0
0
Who the hell voted for american football? It's like rugby just with armour and different rules.

I've seen people have their ears ripped off, noses broken, legs crushed and spines bent playing rugby and since i assume that we're only counting ball sports (no wrestling or boxing, or any other "sports")that makes rugby my choice.
 

Flitt7788mulee

New member
Feb 6, 2011
23
0
0
American football. It was either that or rugby and while in rugby the players don't requite protective gear in the NFL blocking, tacking and pushing is a mandatory aspect. Whereas in rugby, the purpose of the game revolves around running lines and tackling around the waist. NFL: Majority of the players during/ straight after the snap are involved in full on physical warfare with each other, and can just about use any means of stopping/blocking/tacking the other player.
The scrum in rugby is the toughest factor of the sport; but funnily enough it is more casual than blocking in American Football.
 

Samwise137

J. Jonah Jameson
Aug 3, 2010
787
0
0
I voted hockey but I feel like there's one tougher. Hurling seems pretty bad ass. I heard somewhere you can bash people in the back of the head.
 

Flitt7788mulee

New member
Feb 6, 2011
23
0
0
In addition: I actually think ice hockey tougher than Rugby, but I haven't had the benefit of playing Ice hockey. Looks tough. D:
 

fnlrpa

New member
Dec 14, 2010
213
0
0
Lacrosse.
As a goalie, having a solid rubber ball moving at you going 80-100 mph is scary and wearing less pads than other players makes it even scarier
 

luckycharms8282

New member
Mar 28, 2009
540
0
0
Why did you not include boxing and karate and all that jazz? Id have to say track/cross country. For any and every race you participate in, you push your body to its limits, and you go a little bit farther and a little bit faster each time.
 

Flitt7788mulee

New member
Feb 6, 2011
23
0
0
I changed my mind. English football is the toughest sport: regardless of what transpires on the pitch, the fucking enlgish media make it tougher...
 

RhombusHatesYou

Surreal Estate Agent
Mar 21, 2010
7,595
1,914
118
Between There and There.
Country
The Wide, Brown One.
Bonelord said:
Rugby, without a doubt, American football/hockey don't even compare. They wear body armour for christs sake :p
I've played Union, League, American Football and even a bit of Aussie Rules.

American Football seems pussy but when those fuckers wearing it slam into you, you're bloody glad you're wearing it... Doesn't make it any tougher or weaker, though... it all balances out when everyone is kitted out with it.

Toughest for physical contact is a draw for both forms of Rugby and American Football. If pushed for a single winner, I'd say Union because I've been on the bottom of too many rucks not to respect it.

Toughest for endurance would be a coin toss for Union or Aussie Rules. Very limited interchange for both, far more flowing style of play. Tie break would probably go to Aussie rules and the amount of running an elite level midfielder does during the course of a match (of 25+ minute long quarters)... just look at the size of the average aussie rules oval.
 

emeraldrafael

New member
Jul 17, 2010
8,589
0
0
Udyrfrykte said:
You dont have to get into a fight. There's been games without fights in the NHL at least. I'm not sure how bad fighting is in the Russian league or other international leagues, but I've heard its about the same or lower then the NHL.

And by
Udyrfrykte said:
and some players are encouraged to start fights.
It would probably help if you gave me a specific name as an example, but i'm gonna guess you mean the enforcer. That guy just goes out and pretty much his entire job is to discourage the other team from laying some dirty hits. So in a sense, yes, he's encouraged to fight, but more so he's just encouraged to skate around and look tough about stuff so no one takes a run at your star (or any other) player. besides, Most (if not all) fights in the NHL are planned by the players and they'll ask, so there's an etiquette and you can deny to fight.

Which is different from those scuffle things you see players get into when some guys crowd around a puck and tempers flare up. Thats why refs dont break up the fights.

luckycharms8282 said:
Why did you not include boxing and karate and all that jazz? Id have to say track/cross country. For any and every race you participate in, you push your body to its limits, and you go a little bit farther and a little bit faster each time.
I wanted to have sports where the object wasnt physical harm/contact to score points (I.e. Boxing, MMA, Karate). But if you wnat to say that, go ahead. Just if I did, pretty much every post would be MMA or Boxing. SO it was more just a way of evening the playing field.

toothofymir said:
What is crew, and would you (or anyone else) care to elaborate?
 

Sharps92

New member
Dec 25, 2009
35
0
0
I can't personally make a great decision because the only sports i've really played properly out of them are rugby and football (soccer).

Of course rugby is a contact sport and you get hit by big guys, but most injuries in it are simple impact injuries.

I've been playing both Football (soccer) and rugby for years, and I have surprisingly been injured or seen more injuries as a result of football rather than rugby, far more.

Yes football isn't a pure contact sport, but there is a very high risk to pull, strain, tweak muscles in football, plus players are flinging their legs about with blades and studs on their feet.

Even though I am probably biased, more painful muscle injuries are picked up from football rather than *mostly* simple impact injuries from sports such as rugby, hockey, and american football.
 

Abbyrose07

New member
Mar 31, 2010
253
0
0
I would say Ice Hockey...both of my brothers play it and I have seen them get so many injuries from it. One got sliced open with a hockey blade, one got knocked out by a hockey puck, both got concussions from being checked too hard, both have broken multiple bones etc
 
Sep 17, 2009
2,851
0
0
Oh i was going to say boxing before I read the bold so I picked other...woops.

In boxing you are legally allowed to kill a man...

Anyway, I guess I'd say Rugby.
 

Ailia

New member
Nov 11, 2010
261
0
0
I guess it's a Canadian thing, but I'm a bit thrown off by how many people think hockey is hard. .__.

I find rugby brutally hard. The running I'm fine with but after being tackled five times I don't want to get up anymore.
 

emeraldrafael

New member
Jul 17, 2010
8,589
0
0
Nautical Honors Society said:
Oh i was going to say boxing before I read the bold so I picked other...woops.

In boxing you are legally allowed to kill a man...

Anyway, I guess I'd say Rugby.
At this point I wouldnt even worry about it. I'm thinking of changing that, since i've gotten flak for not including Boxing/MMA/Wrestling, though I thought the reason was sound enough and rather common sensical.