Poll: UK ban on Extreme pornography

[Bulletinmybrain]

Take away a sadist's right to get his fix with consenting adults and you might as well release a wave of sexually frustrated rapists onto the streets.

More evidence that way. Can't prove them guility unless they get stupid and leave evidence around.

Its tough, and not right at all I know. But maybe this is for the greater good?

 

[NekoAnastasia]

Take away a sadist's right to get his fix with consenting adults and you might as well release a wave of sexually frustrated rapists onto the streets.

More evidence that way. Can't prove them guility unless they get stupid and leave evidence around.

Its tough, and not right at all I know. But maybe this is for the greater good?

It's all from the perspective of stopping the evil men doing evil things, though. I'm a girl, and I quite like having evil things done to me. Why should that be against the law? I'm 21, I pay taxes, I vote, I have no children to be a role model for. I think if I want to make kinky porn with my partner, I should be allowed.

 

[Bulletinmybrain]

Take away a sadist's right to get his fix with consenting adults and you might as well release a wave of sexually frustrated rapists onto the streets.

More evidence that way. Can't prove them guility unless they get stupid and leave evidence around.

Its tough, and not right at all I know. But maybe this is for the greater good?

It's all from the perspective of stopping the evil men doing evil things, though. I'm a girl, and I quite like having evil things done to me. Why should that be against the law? I'm 21, I pay taxes, I vote, I have no children to be a role model for. I think if I want to make kinky porn with my partner, I should be allowed.

You still can. Unless you have a fetish for doing it in the streets.

Sex in the streets!

 

[NekoAnastasia]

Take away a sadist's right to get his fix with consenting adults and you might as well release a wave of sexually frustrated rapists onto the streets.

More evidence that way. Can't prove them guility unless they get stupid and leave evidence around.

Its tough, and not right at all I know. But maybe this is for the greater good?

It's all from the perspective of stopping the evil men doing evil things, though. I'm a girl, and I quite like having evil things done to me. Why should that be against the law? I'm 21, I pay taxes, I vote, I have no children to be a role model for. I think if I want to make kinky porn with my partner, I should be allowed.

You still can. Unless you have a fetish for doing it in the streets.

Sex in the streets!

But if the police see my homevideos, which I consented and enjoyed making (hypothetically, naturally) I go to prison. That's not right. I know some people think that the creation of extreme pornography (in human cases, I'm ignoring beastiality/necrophilia because I agree with outlawing that) victimises women, but it doesn't, we're victimised when the government says "I don't care if you consent, it's weird, so nyer".

 

[Dudemeister]

(a) an act which threatens a person?s life,

(b)an act which results, or is likely to result, in serious injury to a person?s anus breasts or genitals,

(c) an act which involves or appears to involve sexual interference with a human corpse,

(d) a person performing or appearing to perform an act of intercourse or oral sex with an animal (whether dead or alive)

(e) No fat chicks.

 

[DeusFps]

So where is the democratic vote in which the people have a say in this. Wait I forgot we're not really a democracy.

 

[Bulletinmybrain]

Take away a sadist's right to get his fix with consenting adults and you might as well release a wave of sexually frustrated rapists onto the streets.

More evidence that way. Can't prove them guility unless they get stupid and leave evidence around.

Its tough, and not right at all I know. But maybe this is for the greater good?

It's all from the perspective of stopping the evil men doing evil things, though. I'm a girl, and I quite like having evil things done to me. Why should that be against the law? I'm 21, I pay taxes, I vote, I have no children to be a role model for. I think if I want to make kinky porn with my partner, I should be allowed.

You still can. Unless you have a fetish for doing it in the streets.

Sex in the streets!

But if the police see my homevideos, which I consented and enjoyed making (hypothetically, naturally) I go to prison. That's not right. I know some people think that the creation of extreme pornography (in human cases, I'm ignoring beastiality/necrophilia because I agree with outlawing that) victimises women, but it doesn't, we're victimised when the government says "I don't care if you consent, it's weird, so nyer".

Quick question... Why exactly would you tell where you live when your fucking would go like this...?

You: Put me in a stranglehold baby
Him: *Does it*
You: *Moans*
You: This is the best sex I ever had in the U.K!

 

[NekoAnastasia]

Quick question... Why exactly would you tell where you live when your fucking would go like this...?

You: Put me in a stranglehold baby
Him: *Does it*
You: *Moans*
You: This is the best sex I ever had in the U.K!

The law doesn't mean it has to be made in the UK, it means if you live in the UK and you're caught in possession of any of it, you go to prison. If you star in it, I suppose you go to prison for even longer, since most S&M is illegal.

 

[Bulletinmybrain]

Well I said that, because the internet is the only way the police would find out that you have it.

Unless your house is searched by the police.(And if your house is being searched by the police your in the wrong anyway.

 

[Aardvark]

The one thing that gets me is England already has a justice system stretched to the limits. Overcrowded prisons, insufficient police and a legal code in bad need of an overhaul. Do they honestly think outlawing a vice primarily indulged in by middle/upper class adults, between work, church and raising a family, is really going to make the world a better place?

Spoiler

No, they don't and they never did. This is just another crass attempt at harvesting votes from the religious nutbagority.

 

[Mrsoupcup]

Well I have heard of people fucking dead animals, that needs to fucking stop.

 

[zacaron]

I dont approve of this sort of thing but I think removing it would only make the problem worse.

 

[Johnn Johnston]

This is fascism. Next up: Offensive books. But then Britain has been doing a fair amount of semi-fascist things as of late so it does not surprise me at all.

I didn't realise that banning necrophiliac and bestiality videos was facism.

Only The bestiality should be banned, as animals can't consent. It's the models choice to participate or not, so the government has no right to censor it. Orwell is rolling in his grave. (Or perhaps jubilant that his predictions came true.)

As I was reading through the posts, I saw the words "Necrophilia" and "Orwell is rolling in his grave". The image that threw itself into my mind was probably not what you meant by that.

 

[Flap Jack452]

I think is disgusting and wrong to have sex with a dead person or an animal, but if it makes some peoples' dick hard then the government shouldnt be able to outlaw it.

 

[arcainia]

I love how people pull the "freedom of speech" crap when complaining about their precious porn. I wish people would use that protesting energy on something more meaningful. It's just...porn. Christ. I'd think the normal kind would be good enough for most people. No need to add fake corpeses or animals in there. And if that sort of ban is so lifechnaging for you that you can't go on...well, I hope I never meet you on the street.

 

[sorry user name taken.]

considering how things ''use'' to be (tv,movies..and um porn) things have gotten a little too laid back and some things need to be toned down.


true when you ban things like this it makes people curious or want it more =/...example like most rockstar games (sorry I'm a nerd).

 

[Jharry5]

UK government becomes more and more authoritarian by the day. We are the only "free" nation with no right of silence when arrested, no right to talk to legal representative when arrested, no right to trial by jury. You can be held for a month, without charge, without your family even being told where you are and what you are being held for. The entire country is wired with cameras watching your every move, they are trying to pass laws to get every single man, woman, and childs DNA and finger-prints on a database.

Now this.

Welcome to Alcatraz.

Well said.
I personally think that someone should be able to do whatever they want as long as it doesn't involve an unconsenting person/animal etc.
By definition, an animal can't consent, and a corpse could only do so before their death. Surely someone that-way-inclined would realise that donating their body to science would probably benefit more people...?

 

[orifice]

Voted not sure. But I wouldn't watch any of those things listed in the first post anyway.

 

[Chiasm]

But if the police see my homevideos, which I consented and enjoyed making (hypothetically, naturally) I go to prison. That's not right. I know some people think that the creation of extreme pornography (in human cases, I'm ignoring beastiality/necrophilia because I agree with outlawing that) victimises women, but it doesn't, we're victimised when the government says "I don't care if you consent, it's weird, so nyer".

Mind you I agree on the whole your consent should override anything,But playing the other side I could see what they may think let me give you a few examples.

A man could be abusive to his wife and child and when he gets caught assaulting his wife with homemade taped videos of him raping her, He'll just have her say it was consent and then nothing would happen. People who have been abused will back me up in it is the furthest thing from your mind to actually inform someone of your abuse. So many wives could be forced into just saying it is consent.

It is likely this sort of thing could happen and could be a reason to ban it,Though is that the governments reason no. But it would have been a better one for taking away consent.

Also I am not sure how you can say play assault is not weird but then say bestiality is weird. As a fetishist we all should be understanding to all fetishists no matter what I think. I don't criticize your love of being beat up as much I trust you won't criticize my love for princess dresses as we are both in the same grey area when it comes to governments.

 

[jasoncyrus]

well as many have said a law isn't going to do jack *shit*. They can't enforce it without coming into your place without proof. Proof is kind a hard to get without monitoring net activity(which thankfully they arn't allowed...The amount of TV showed on here would have me in some serious financial shit).

While we're on the topic (sort of), how can they tell if a male animal isn't enjoying mating with a human female?

Personally it'd be more effective to simple have government run brothels, people wouldn't be looking up porn coz they be A) working, B) having sex at said brothels, C) eating/drinking/etc D) bathing or E) sleeping. F) (best for last) gaming!/hobbies

Those who weren't doing any of those at one point is shifty and needs to be investigated.