Res Plus said:Well part of the tution fee settlement was that access for genuinely very, very poorest was increased. There have never, ever been more scholarships or bursaries for "geniuses".Tipsy Giant said:OK, well let me clarify what I meant.
As tuition fees increase and qualifying grades go down, the people who can afford to go is smaller, therefor ensuring places for those who can afford uni, rather than places for our best and brightest regardless of financial position, this is the only way to capture our nations genius' and by not doing so, hundreds of talented and motivated people are not getting the opportunity to advance themselves and the country.
We all miss out when our best are sidelined due to Greed
In fact what has happened is that all the people who wandered through school and then went off to do "media studies" and and get drunk for 3 years, and crucially started to believe it was a right not a privilege, will now have to really consider whether they want to go rather than being put up at tax payers' expense. No "genuises" are being excluded, that is pure hyperbole, "talented and motivated people" don't have to go to university to "advance themselves and the country".
And then we come back to inevitable left wing sloganeering, changing "the rich" for "Greed" is to merely subsitute one nebulous catch phrase for another. You do realise the average tax payer isn't a billionaire right? A couple of pennies on income tax to pay for 80,000 people to go to university for 3 years is a hundred quid or so out of every UK tax payers' pocket. You do realise the State (and by State I mean the taxpayer) has already covered free education from 7 to 18 right? At what point does the indivdual's demand from the tax payer become the "Greed" you so depise?
I'm not trying to sloganeer? i'm trying to point out the cost of a society that accepts people being ultra rich.
You are saying that paying for people to go to university costs tax payers a hundred quid each, but that's you assuming that these costs should be shared equally. What about closing loop holes which allow corporations to pay ZERO tax in the UK and then using this money, or increase the tax rate of anyone who's total income is over 500,000 per annum.
But this won't happen for as long as our government is made up of people who enjoy the top 1% lifestyle