Sewora said:
ReinWeisserRitter said:
Rodrigo Girao said:
Well, I DO have problems on this regard, and know that many more also do. Of course it won't be "that big of a deal" when you actively dismiss those who state that it is.
Well, unless it's causing you physical discomfort or endangers your health, it might do you good to simply change your point of view on the matter. The vast majority of our problems, particularly with ourselves, are mostly in our heads, afterall.
Sewora said:
ReinWeisserRitter said:
I pray you're being facetious for comedic effect.
Human rights. Look it up. If you don't like it, I can come chop off parts of your body and see how you like not having a say in what bodyparts you are allowed to have and not.
I can probably come up with a thousand good reasons as to why you shouldn't have said bodyparts, and back it up with scientific research.
Won't make it right, but it's the identical process as circumcision so it should be fine, right?
If you argue against that, you argue against circumcision. I've made an analogy that can't be argued against unless you form a valid view on circumcision first.
I hope you enjoy that answer better my friend.
Not really, given that it had fuck all to do with what you originally said. And on that note, our view of sex, largely as recreation, doesn't have a damn thing to do with "the fundamental pinnacle for life and all biological existance in the universe". That only involves putting it in there until it starts making babies, not the aesthetics of your freaking penis or your right to keep its freaking skin in tact.
And as I've already said, I don't give two damns about circumcision and think you're whining about spilled milk. If they chopped off an arm, I could see the issue, but you, at the least, appear to be complaining solely because no one asked you whether you wanted a negligible bit of skin removed. No one asked me if I wanted to be born (I'd have passed, if you're curious) either, and I don't moan about
that at the slightest provocation. Some things are better left getting the fuck over.
I'm uncircumsized, and I'm fighting for mens sexual freedom and equality.
And the difference is, you can do something about being born, but if you've been permanently damage you cannot undo it, all you can do is either accept it as reality or question it.
Sure you can do something about it; you can get over it and not have it done to your own kids if you get them.
Sewora said:
And you think too simply to understand what I meant with "the fundamental pinnacle for life and all biological existance in the universe".
Hahahaha.
I'm sorry, but it sounds like the problem is more you think too highly of yourself for saying such things with a straight face.
Straight fingers? Whatever, straightness.
Sewora said:
The principle is simple, sex is fundamental for our existance, so all existance is dependant on sex. So everything regarding sex should be taken seriously.
I'm just going to say that's the worst logic ever and leave it at that outside of the following analogy: "We live on earth so everything on earth pertains to us."
Sound stupid? It is. But it's similar in scope to what you just said.
Sewora said:
The right to choose your own sexuality is the most important aspect of modern human society.
You may be amazed to know that the vast majority of important things that happen in our lives don't have a damn thing to do with sex, then, making that completely wrong.
Sewora said:
Disallowing someone the power over their own genitals is immoral and inhumane. Any homosexual will tell you that it's immoral to disallow people their choice of sexuality.
Those two statements have very little to do with each other. You're grasping
hard, here.
Also, homosexuals are not the sole faction to consult on the morality of sexuality, or the denial thereof. Your implication of the contrary, intentional or otherwise, is grossly ignorant.
Sewora said:
The genitals are directly connected to our sexuality,
This is true, in some cases.
Sewora said:
so it's one of the most important parts of our body, physiologically, psychologically and spiritually.
While this is bollocks. An asexual person could bore you to death with why it is (and would probably be right, by and large), and that's just one group of people.
As for you, you're grouping everyone based on your own perception of the world. Sex is not important to everyone, sexuality is not a large part of everyone's life, and is especially not a large part of their spirituality or psychology. Go tell a Buddhist monk what he'd think of your thoughts on what constitutes an important part of his spirituality and psychology, and if you're lucky, he won't smile at you in mild amusement.
Put another way, sex and sexuality is as different between people as the people themselves are between each other. You are
far from the sole authority on what it means to everyone, and your apparent belief otherwise is one of the very few things I've found offensive on the internet, even if mildly so.
That said, you probably have good intentions. But frankly, I believe them to be grossly misaimed and in need of re-evaluation.
