Having a PC that could run Crysis above medium settings was a point of pride.
Apart from that, though, it was another boring arse FPS 'meh'-fest.
Apart from that, though, it was another boring arse FPS 'meh'-fest.
B-b-b-b-because consolers always get exclusives that could be played on PCs but don't share and wah wah wah sniffle.Onyx Oblivion said:Hey, if it was gonna be able to run on consoles anyway...why not? I mean, the fact that it's now set in a city and doesn't need to render all the plantlife is why consoles can run it, right?
Buy all of relic's RTS games and bask in the envy.ucciolord1 said:I'd rather it be a PC exclusive, but I'm all for one of my favorite developers making tons of money, so yeah. I'm not against it being on consoles, I just like having something to brag about to my "normal" XBox-loving peers.
Nah Crysis already supported the 360 controller automatical but annoyingly you couldn't change the buttonsIBlackKiteI said:Nah i dont think its such a good idea.
I got nothing against Crysis and havent played the first because my PC probably couldnt run it.
But if its on consoles too they are gonna have to dumb it down because of controller limitations (and cos the majority of console players are tards) and the graphics will have to be worse compared to the first if they wanna have more than two guys on screen.
And from what I heard Crysis is pretty generic without its graphics.
So taking away what makes Crysis good will make the game pretty mediocre i think.
I own a Xbox 360 and mainly play that, but PC is undoubtedly superior.
I would love to be able to play Crysis 2 on the box but I think that it should still be a PC exclusive if its going to rival the first.
PS3 maybe could handle it though, without freezing and destroying reality like the sucky Box would.