Poll: What do you think of furries?

Recommended Videos

captainwolfos

New member
Feb 14, 2009
595
0
0
Eh, I'm totally indifferent. I like some of the art, but some of the porn is disturbing.

[small]Not that I go actively looking for this stuff, or anything...[/small]
 

dvd_72

New member
Jun 7, 2010
581
0
0
Macgyvercas said:
And as an added bonus, being nice to furries pisses off the WBC, so score!
Sounds like a reason enough to -become- one! :p

HankMan said:
This thread is bound to get real hairy, real fast.
Bad pun! go to your room! :p
 

orangebandguy

Elite Member
Jan 9, 2009
3,117
0
41
I don't like the teen angst that surrounds it, or the shitty artwork they produce en mass.

The whole sexual thing disgusts me in all honesty. But I'm not going to kill anyone over it, or argue over it. I wish they would keep to themselves a bit more.
 

Trololo Punk

New member
May 14, 2011
672
0
0
Couldn't really care, what someone does with their "free time" is their business.
Also to be honest, it really creep me out either but I'm not a furry myself.
 

Android2137

New member
Feb 2, 2010
813
0
0
I like a good anthropomorphic art, especially when it's an unexpected animal or its presented in a new way (like Rene Magritte's mermaid), but I don't want to hear about the people who get off on them.
 

DarthFennec

New member
May 27, 2010
1,154
0
0
Kayla Heater said:
Well, I am one. But its not really a fetish for me. Its just a way of expressing who I am.
And as for the tail thing, theres lots of ways to go about it. Do goth kids wear black make up for attention, or do they wear it because she likes it? Does that person wear bright yellow to stand out, or because they like yellow?
As for me, I wear my tail because I like to.
Welcome to the forum! We've got a group, you should go join :3
 

Irony's Acolyte

Back from the Depths
Mar 9, 2010
3,636
0
0
Furries? Vile creatures they are, best not to let them establish themselves anywhere.

No, but seriously, I really don't care that much. They're fine with me. Not my cup of tea, but I'm sure I have interests that people would say the same thing about. Live and let live is what I do with the furries. Sure there's that small minority in the furry fandom that is really creepy, but then of course I imagine every fandom has that small, creepy minority within it.
Fwee said:
Yaoi/yiffy creeps me out a little when it pops up uninvited.
I'm okay with furries. Actually, if there was a woman that asked me to dress up with her to satisfy her predilection, yeah I'd totally go for it. As long as it didn't cost too much.
Ever see that episode of Entourage?
Just wanted to quote you and point out that Yaoi is something quite different than furry (where the "yiff" comes into play). You probably don't want to get them confused.
 

Troublesome Lagomorph

The Deadliest Bunny
May 26, 2009
27,258
0
0
DarthFennec said:
Troublesome Lagomorph said:
Don't like them at all. I find them fugly and consider it bestiality.
After all, they ARE animals, are they not?
... No? You have an anthropomorphic animal as your avatar, do you consider it an animal? I don't, I think it's a human with animal features and characteristics. Which is exactly what we're talking about. ... unless she's just got fake ears, but I assume not.

Also, furriness extends beyond sex, there's a lot more to it than just the fetish. Saying that furries are gross because bestiality is like saying otaku are gross because tentacle rape, or I could compare it to any number of other fandoms out there. I could say all preschool teachers are pedophiles and it would make just as much sense.
Oh really. I didn't realize mechanical implants were anthro.
 

DarthFennec

New member
May 27, 2010
1,154
0
0
Troublesome Lagomorph said:
DarthFennec said:
Troublesome Lagomorph said:
Don't like them at all. I find them fugly and consider it bestiality.
After all, they ARE animals, are they not?
... No? You have an anthropomorphic animal as your avatar, do you consider it an animal? I don't, I think it's a human with animal features and characteristics. Which is exactly what we're talking about. ... unless she's just got fake ears, but I assume not.

Also, furriness extends beyond sex, there's a lot more to it than just the fetish. Saying that furries are gross because bestiality is like saying otaku are gross because tentacle rape, or I could compare it to any number of other fandoms out there. I could say all preschool teachers are pedophiles and it would make just as much sense.
Oh really. I didn't realize mechanical implants were anthro.
Alright then, they're fake. I'm pretty sure I put that qualifier in there :p

There are a lot of anime where the ears and tail are things are real. What's your opinion on those?
 

Variable X

New member
Aug 23, 2010
17
0
0
I've got a bit of an odd way of looking at it. I guess it's a scale of anthropomorphism interest. It starts with those who like the basic idea of anthropomorphism, stuff like stone golems, trents, the homunculus from FMA. Human features on non-human things.

Then yah move onto light animal based anthropomorphism, or the "I'm not a furry because I just like cat-girls" crowd. Pretty self explanatory.

Next is interest in animal based anthropomorphism from an aesthetic stand point. No sexual interests what so ever. A great example is Lackadaisy Cats, were all the characters are anthropomorphic cats because the artist feels that they convey better expressions, and they do!

After that is what people normally think of as a "Furry", though I refuse to call them that. Same as above except they do have a sexual interest as well. This is where things like anthro-personas and mild to intense explicit content with all the bog standard fetishes (feet, large/small breasts, BDSM, and so on) come into play. "Stage performance" fur-suits are in this section too. I consider myself between this category and the last.

Then come the people I despise. This is my definition of the word Furry. Anyone who partakes in one or more of the following: Devoting a majority of their time creating, purchasing or view explicit content, un-ironic use of "furry words" (yiff, purring/barking, using animal parts or terminology instead of human, murr, that whole deal), extreme fetishes, sexual use of a "fur-suit", calling a significant other "mate", multiple set of the same genitalia, and getting huffy about "fursecution"

And lastly there are those who take it even farther. Those are they kind that legitimately believe it's a lifestyle and should be unconditionally respected, believe that the "Fandom" is a coherent group that can "push people out", believe they actually are an animal in a human's body, systematic liars and massive creeps, god-complexed "furry police", and the hyper-drama mongers and mentally detatched/deranged that will go far enough to threaten legal action/DMCA over petty things. These types also suffer the symptoms of the previous group.
 

Troublesome Lagomorph

The Deadliest Bunny
May 26, 2009
27,258
0
0
DarthFennec said:
Troublesome Lagomorph said:
DarthFennec said:
Troublesome Lagomorph said:
Don't like them at all. I find them fugly and consider it bestiality.
After all, they ARE animals, are they not?
... No? You have an anthropomorphic animal as your avatar, do you consider it an animal? I don't, I think it's a human with animal features and characteristics. Which is exactly what we're talking about. ... unless she's just got fake ears, but I assume not.

Also, furriness extends beyond sex, there's a lot more to it than just the fetish. Saying that furries are gross because bestiality is like saying otaku are gross because tentacle rape, or I could compare it to any number of other fandoms out there. I could say all preschool teachers are pedophiles and it would make just as much sense.
Oh really. I didn't realize mechanical implants were anthro.
Alright then, they're fake. I'm pretty sure I put that qualifier in there :p

There are a lot of anime where the ears and tail are things are real. What's your opinion on those?
Compare: something shaped like a human but with nearly all animal features and a human with a feature or two? Same thing? They're both anthropomorphism, but one is clearly VERY far on the animal side of the spectrum. Far enough, I'd say, to just call it an animal.
Basically its the difference between animal with human features and human with animal features.
 

A velociraptor

New member
May 12, 2009
194
0
0
Honestly, it's a fetish. Just like S&M, Bondage, group sex, and the myriad of other fetishes out there. I experimented with it a long time ago, it didn't do it for me, I moved on. I don't understand why people think it's worse than any other fetish, but some people also think tattoos are of the devil, so whatever.
 

Riobux

New member
Apr 15, 2009
1,955
0
0
If they want to be that way, go for it. As long they're not preforming acts of bestiality (which a very small minority do), I am fine with it.
 

Erana

New member
Feb 28, 2008
8,010
0
0
Gralian said:
Is social identity really that important to you, even if it can lead to discrimination and hatred?
Well, if I as an asexual (AKA: the sexual minority with the most innocuous identifier ever) feel the need to come out of the closet, I do think there's something to being out about social identity. When its your favorite fandom, I don't think people need to declare it as adamantly as some furries do, but the urge to announce one's interests is understandable.