Because it's Metal Gear Rising, not Metal Gear Solid.FillerDmon said:Why the hell isn't Revengeance an option?
MGR not MGS.
Because it's Metal Gear Rising, not Metal Gear Solid.FillerDmon said:Why the hell isn't Revengeance an option?
Because it's "Rising," not "Solid."FillerDmon said:Why the hell isn't Revengeance an option?
That's why a lot of people still prefer the first MGS over the sequels, warts and all, because it wasn't pulling any of that nonense yet. Than Twin Snakes has to go and insert it anyway. And taking away Naomi's accent was a fucking crime. The voice acting in general was weaker.Kyrian007 said:Couldn't vote in the poll. There wasn't an option for MGS: Twin Snakes, which makes MGS better than MGS3. It gives the PS1 era game even better gameplay than the PS2 did for MGS2. It did crank up the action in the cutscenes to ridiculous levels, but really is it TOO over the top when there's a motorcycle-fu fight in MS3? Twin Snakes for the Gamecube is the best version of the best game in the series.
And I've always maintained that the MGS "purists" were just acting out of closet Gamecube hate repackaged as rage over an accent (even though the same voice actors were used,) or over-the-top action (because we all know how tastefully understated Hideo Kojima directed games usually are.) But nowadays I admit it's a nuanced position, and only a part of the Twin Snakes naysayers covering their real motives.Casual Shinji said:That's why a lot of people still prefer the first MGS over the sequels, warts and all, because it wasn't pulling any of that nonense yet. Than Twin Snakes has to go and insert it anyway. And taking away Naomi's accent was a fucking crime. The voice acting in general was weaker.