Poll: What hurts more: kicked in the balls or giving birth?

[RA92]

Tell you what...let's wait until someone can do both and ask them.

Well, grab your crowbar then...

http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20090704104321/half-life/en/images/c/c1/Gonarch.jpg

Gonarch - the balls that gave birth. And had spider legs.

Also, fuck you Valve.

 

[DazBurger]

No man who has ever received a kick to the balls would ever want to get another.

Thats not the case with childbirth...

Following that logic would mean that a kick to the balls is more painful that giving birth.

 

[claymoreguy18]

I am unable to conceive being of the male persuasion however i would guess that ejecting a living baby out of a hole the size of an eye socket can't exactly be pleasurable.

 

[Darknacht]

Giving birth unless you burst a testicle then the balls hurt more. At least thats what science says.

 

[kortin]

probably birth. Being kicked in the balls hurts, but i don't really know about giving birth. It lasts a lot longer than being kicked in the balls.

 

[kikimaru024]

Giving birth is natural.

Getting kicked in the balls is not.

 

[dex-dex]

birth jackass.
ok that was not necessary. getting kicked in the balls will hurt for a lot shorter time than giving birth.

 

[Laser Priest]

Find someone who has experience both recently and ask them.

 

[Frotality]

you do know this question is anatomically impossible to answer? women generally have more tolerance for pain (mythbusters approved!) for just such reason.

a kick in the nads is a quick, sharp pain, but childbirth is hours of what i imagine is agony. maybe getting kicked in the balls every 10 minutes for hours can compare, but they are 2 very different kinds of pain as it is.

id go with childbirth....thinking about whether id like chinese water torture or a high-pressure fire hose to the face, im of the opinion elongated mild pain is generally worse than quick severe pain; and childbirth probably isnt all that mild anyway, if the screaming and crushing peoples hands is any indication.

 

[WilliamRLBaker]

Child birth but passing a stone equals child birth.

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. No.

The vagina is designed to give birth. The penis isn't designed to shoot out lumps of sharp, jagged pieces of calcium oxalate crystals.

1.Women can pass stones
2.The urethra is designed to stretch somewhat
3.just because something is desigend a way doesn't mean the very action it was designed for Doesn't change things I.E it hurts
4.Most stones people pass are not sharp or jagged but rounded the reason it hurts is because it forces its way through. Sharp and jagged stones usually don't pass and thus a person needs surgery to remove them *or they use ultra sonics to break up the stones*

It is commonly said that the only way a man can experience the pain of child birth is by passing a stone and the reason is is becasue its pain is like that of child birth.
By the way the If it was perfectly designed to give birth children would walk out of the womb not have to be pushed in an average 6 hour labor and when they come out their skulls smooshed into unatural angles because there wasn't enough room as Well not all vagina's are created equal some women cannot produce natural childbirth but instead have to have c sections because there isn't enough room hence the term child bearing hips.

 

[ComradeJim270]

No man who has ever received a kick to the balls would ever want to get another.

Thats not the case with childbirth...

Following that logic would mean that a kick to the balls is more painful that giving birth.

Following your (and that of the pages and pages of people who already said this) logic, women go through childbirth specifically for the experience of pushing a large, squirming object through their cervix, and not because they want children. This argument is absolutely absurd. Also, I've already pointed out, repeatedly, that there are men who greatly enjoy being struck in the testicles.

 

[mikespoff]

No pain can possibly be greater than being kicked in the balls, dude.

Except, perhaps, having your balls ripped off and shredded for about 12 hours? i.e., giving birth?

 

[00slash00]

to anyone who says getting kicked in the balls hurts more, i can only say that i sincerely hope youre joking. maybe if you got kicked in the balls nonstop for 8 hours or so

 

[Quaidis]

i would say getting kicked in the balls. When giving birth you can choose to get drugged to numb the pain and the vagina stretches. I'm not saying that giving birth doesn't hurt but a swift kick to the balls is like a guys auto reset button. We go down and do not get up for a few minutes depending on the severity of it. Also kicked hard enough can cause death. But to put the cherry on top it can happen WHENEVER. We do not have an option to prepare for it.

'Drugged to numb the pain' is referring to the needle they stab into a woman's lower spine without any real pre-numbing, correct? My mother once told me about that, and how it was one of the worst pains she's ever felt short of getting a C-section while awake.

Not to say that getting kicked in the balls wouldn't hurt like a *****. I'd imagine that giving birth would be worse, though it entirely depends on the woman in question.

 

[Nooh]

In total "amount" of pain? Probably pregnancy due to the length of the actual experience.

In intensity? Probably getting kicked in the balls, the pain can actually be so powerful that you lose consciousness.