Poll: What is the Big Deal With Bloody Shakespeare?!?!

Recommended Videos

Srdjan

New member
Mar 12, 2010
693
0
0
Well he wrote some of the most brilliant plays in the history of men kind, theathrical genius.
 

House_Vet

New member
Dec 27, 2009
247
0
0
His stuff is just... the bedrock for a HUGE amount of the English language; he, Milton and Chaucer are the 3 greatest wordsmiths ever in our language and so if you think you'd be talking the way you do if he wasn't around you're deluded.

Edit: Oh, and the plays are THE SHIT, as are his sonnets - funny, filthy minded and generally awesome once you get to know em.
 

TheTaco007

New member
Sep 10, 2009
1,339
0
0
Mr Montmorency said:
Apparently he's written comedy. I've never laughed once.
Comedy =/= Funny. Comedy = opposite of tragedy. Tragedy = bad ending. Comedy = good ending, not necessarily funny.
 

Dr. wonderful

New member
Dec 31, 2009
3,260
0
0
...Well, it kind of a big deal.

H ecoined new words, open up a brand way of storytelling and his plays arn't half bad.


Plus I'm on team Capulet.
 

Owyn_Merrilin

New member
May 22, 2010
7,370
0
0
TheTaco007 said:
Mr Montmorency said:
Apparently he's written comedy. I've never laughed once.
Comedy =/= Funny. Comedy = opposite of tragedy. Tragedy = bad ending. Comedy = good ending, not necessarily funny.
His comedies, however, were hilarious. Unfortunately, it doesn't leap out of the page -- especially today, when the language is just different enough that it's hard to understand. Reading silently doesn't cut it; it has to be acted aloud. In that case, assuming the lines are delivered correctly and the audience is following closely enough along, people fall out of their chairs from laughing. Even his tragedies had quite a lot of comic relief.
 

The Grim Ace

New member
May 20, 2010
483
0
0
If you really find him boring read Titus Andronicus. It'll change your opinion of him instantly as well as give you a new appreciation of meat pies.

Otherwise, he is a great writer and playwright but I can't deny he is on a bit of a pedestal that isn't that necessary. Oh well, still better than Twilight.
 

Ghostkai

New member
Jun 14, 2008
1,170
0
0
His works are frankly brilliant for his time, he was pioneer for his day in his art.

You lack of grammar and spelling only hurt your case in your "critique" of one of the greatest masters of the English language of all time.

Also, while you may not like him or his work, you can at least do him credit by spelling his bloody name right. Seriously.
 

TheTaco007

New member
Sep 10, 2009
1,339
0
0
Owyn_Merrilin said:
TheTaco007 said:
Mr Montmorency said:
Apparently he's written comedy. I've never laughed once.
Comedy =/= Funny. Comedy = opposite of tragedy. Tragedy = bad ending. Comedy = good ending, not necessarily funny.
His comedies, however, were hilarious. Unfortunately, it doesn't leap out of the page -- especially today, when the language is just different enough that it's hard to understand. Reading silently doesn't cut it; it has to be acted aloud. In that case, assuming the lines are delivered correctly and the audience is following closely enough along, people fall out of their chairs from laughing. Even his tragedies had quite a lot of comic relief.
Oh yeah, I laughed my ass off at certain parts of Romeo & Juliet.
 

Iron Lightning

Lightweight Extreme
Oct 19, 2009
1,237
0
0
Dude, don't read Shakespeare, watch Shakespeare. While his plays are completely brilliant however you choose to experience them, I find them best when performed. The BBC has done most of Shakespeare's plays, which are available on youtube in their totality.
 

HK_01

New member
Jun 1, 2009
1,610
0
0
I think what he wrote is utterly terrible and not in the least interesting or fun to read. I guess it's like painting. What might have been considered a masterpiece in Medieval times is easily outclassed by any decent Rennaissance painting.
 

Soviet Heavy

New member
Jan 22, 2010
12,218
0
0
Once you learn how to read Shakespeare, his plays get a lot funnier, since you understand the syntax.

As for my favorite play, Othello. Iago is the best villain ever written.
 

Deleric

New member
Dec 29, 2008
1,393
0
0
Seems like a pretty cool guy. Eh dreams in the middle of summer and dusn't afrade of anything.

...But yeah, he's pretty good. Reading old English is fun.
 

VonBrewskie

New member
Apr 9, 2009
480
0
0
What's the deal with bloody Shakespear? Shake spear, no more bloody. Ungah-bungah! (Of course you mean Shakespeare. I know that silly!)
 

Flaming Geek

New member
May 4, 2010
16
0
0
Um, Shakespear(e) basically invented English as we know it. And literature. And drama. Basically, it's the only culture we white people are allowed to have so leave it alone!

I don't think he's the best in the world, but he's really dang good and we owe him a ton. So I say yay for Shakespear(e)!

Honestly, if you take away all the "Themes"(trademark) that English teachers try to cram down your throat about him, he's REALLY GOOD. If it wasn't for the school system, a lot more people would be fans of him. Especially since he's got a dirty streak a mile and a half wide. Really, the number of sex jokes in there is RIDICULOUS, you'd think the internet would be all over him.
 

GrinningManiac

New member
Jun 11, 2009
4,090
0
0
1. THE playwright of the day
2. Invented almost half of all modern-day euphemisms, sayings and expressions
3. Good stories


I hate Romeo and Juliet, though. The two titular characters are thick twits.
 

TheRightToArmBears

New member
Dec 13, 2008
8,674
0
0
Shakespeare was one of the greatest users of the English language ever. Once you get used to how it is written it makes a whole lot more sense and genuinely funny, imaginative and intelligent.

I bite my thumb at thee, sir.
 

Yeager942

New member
Oct 31, 2008
1,097
0
0
For people who think Shakespeare is uninteresting, allow me to quote twelfth night.

"It's from her C's to her U's to her T's from which she P's."

The "cut" from where she pees? Toilet humor, 16thcentury style.
 

DeathWyrmNexus

New member
Jan 5, 2008
1,143
0
0
He is one of the fathers of modern English... His work requires more thinking to read because it is about four hundreds years old. And I have a hard time taking the opinion of somebody possessing your grammatical skill seriously in regards to what is "good" literature.

*awesome face*
 

CloggedDonkey

New member
Nov 4, 2009
4,055
0
0
Heh, I found is stuff to be above average. It's better than most of the stuff I had to read in school. Then I read Grapes of Wrath, and I found that Steinbeck is far better than most of the stuff I was forced to read in school.
 

Jackalb

New member
Dec 31, 2009
1,178
0
0
Seriously just go home. How very dare you.
Cry 'havoc,' and let slip the dogs of war.