"But the minute you say, "Gamer Gate," everyone is going to think of the stuff I mentioned"Nomanslander said:It's taken over, there's nothing that can be done to take it back. You might be interested in the corruption of game journalism, and only that. But the minute you say, "Gamer Gate," everyone is going to think of the stuff I mentioned and start asking you questions like, "have you ever berating someone online because of their gender," and it's going to be taken in a direction you don't want it to go.MrFalconfly said:What has Anita got to do with anything regarding #Gamergate?
That's just he nature of the beast.
And that is why I return to my original statement that "Nothing is so screwed up that it can't be fixed".
I don't care that people think "Misogyny" when I say #Gamergate.
#Gamergate is like Anonymous when it comes to that. It's like a colony of microbes. It's not a giant organism (or organisation), and the acts of bad apples don't reflect on the collective.
I associate with #Gamergate exactly because they want to fix the dismal state of Gaming Journalism.
I identify as a Gamer, precisely because that's what I am. I play videogames, I'm an enthusiast.
And I'm sick and tired of being marginalized, just because I happen to have pale skin, a Y-chromosome and have an interest in videogames.
Apparently I'm a racist, just because I'm more likely to be sunburned in the summer.
Apparently I'm a misogynist only because I'm capable of standing up while taking a piss.
And apparently I'm some kind of reactionary, cellar-dwelling, unhygienic neanderthal, just because I identify as a Gamer.
No!
That is not how it works.
You want to have a discussion? Fine, ask me anything, but don't make assumptions based on my skin-tone, my gender, or my interests.