Video Games are the medium that takes visuals, sounds and interactivity and has the true potential to be the greatest, purest form of Art. Of course if we keep churning out Modern Warfare 57's then we will never achieve that goal.
ThisWarty Bliggens said:
Nice try, but you cannot read mindsRensenhito said:Video games have the potential to be the greatest form of art; however, since they have yet to live up to that potential, I'll have to go with my first love - music.
I know what you're thinking - music? Why? It's got to be one of the more limited art forms, since it doesn't include anything visual, tactile, olfactory, etc.
My reply: that's the beauty. The limitations of music are what makes it interesting. Well, that and the fact that music has the intrinsic ability to bypass the logical brains of most people and cut to the emotional core.
Its a genuine sign of maturity to admit fault (even more so on the internet) so thankyou. Equally I owe you an apology (hope this doesn't undermine my maturity opinion), I had a shit day at work and was nit picking. The terms best/favourite tend to be used interchangably and it was clear what you meant. Also dividing cinema broadly while problematic it was again clear what you meant.Adrian Neyland said:I'm sorry, you are correct, I probably should of worded my questions and responses more clearly.tigermilk said:You asked about "greatest" not favourite form of art, denoting grading arts by some arbitary form of quality. Personal preference would be reflected in the use of the term favourite.Adrian Neyland said:This is not about quantifying art, it is all about looking at it on the merits of its qualities and giving a personal preference (I did put an ALL option if you think all art is equil), and in the film section did not imply anything about the merits of documentary film making or narrative film making, all it was doing is recognizing the existence of both categories.tigermilk said:Art cannot be quantified and neither should one attempt to in my opinion.
To avoid a low post count I am studying for a Masters Degree in Film Studies perhaps reflecting a personal preference amongst the arts.
EDIT: If you want to try and quantify abstract qualitites you may wish to pursue the (fundamentally flawed) Benthamite methodology of the 'felicific calculus'.
EDIT 2: Is the OP suggesting all "fictional" cinema has a narrative and all documentaries do not? I would take issue with both assertions.
I am not questioning the relative values of "narrative" and "documentary" cinema, merely highlighting my bemusment with your choice of terminology.