On the Wisconsin subject, Scott Walker is doing what he needs to do to fix the economy. People here don't like that cuz they're used to having a governor who sat on his ass all day.
Calling all americans ignorant is not the best way to make friends on here. You only end up starting an arguement, but that's already happened I guess.Laurie Barnes said:Yeah and how the hell else are we supposed to learn about America? I use the internet, I start discussions like this to better my understanding. Furthermore, if your own media,(and/or government) is portraying your country as not only a cesspool of the ignorant but a oozing sore our planet would be better without(whether this is true or not), and you still don't think there is something wrong, then you are delusional.Grabbin Keelz said:Not really, considering most of the threads come from people who only hear about America from our media (which we all know is a wholehearted reliable source) and our government.(again)Laurie Barnes said:If you see this thread once a week, don't you think there might actually be something wrong if so many people seem to think so?Grabbin Keelz said:I see a thread like this almost every week now. America really isn't such a bad place to live in.
As for Fox News, its a joke. Even worse is that most of our media strives to be like them.
It's fine to point out stuff like that, but it kinda hurts when everyone makes America out to be a terrible place in general. I live here and I can tell you it's not as bad as everyone thinks.
Grabbin Keelz said:I see a thread like this almost every week now. America really isn't such a bad place to live in.
As for Fox News, its a joke. Even worse is that most of our media strives to be like them.
argeedk-ossuburb said:I find it ironic that the people that FOX would call "heroes" after 9/11 (firemen, police officers, etc.) are the same people they're antagonizing right now.
It's like FOX bases every one of its stories on emotional reactions and personal opinions instead of evidence and facts, and we know that's not the case. They're a news company after all. Herpa derp, derp, durrrr. FOX IS DA BESTEST COZ THEY SUPPORT JEEZUS AN' I LIKES JEEZUS! Durr.
Yes because Fox is the only news organization who does that. I recall when that one governor got killed by that lunatic every liberal news station was blaming Sarah Palin and glen beck and saying the shooter was a right wing nut job. Even though none of that was true. In fact the shooter was a liberal. All news organizations are guilty of doing this kind of nonsense so please don't make it sound like Fox is the only one guilty, okay?JordanXlord said:argeedk-ossuburb said:I find it ironic that the people that FOX would call "heroes" after 9/11 (firemen, police officers, etc.) are the same people they're antagonizing right now.
It's like FOX bases every one of its stories on emotional reactions and personal opinions instead of evidence and facts, and we know that's not the case. They're a news company after all. Herpa derp, derp, durrrr. FOX IS DA BESTEST COZ THEY SUPPORT JEEZUS AN' I LIKES JEEZUS! Durr.
and i think if jesus was watching fox news
He would Face palm and go
"I died for THIS?!"
Yes I figured when I posted that you would be able to better defend the points made.Also after I made it I tried to think of new liberal ideas that went though in america that ended up being the wrong choice but I couldn't think of any, of coarse we wouldn't be as much as a superpower as we were today If we constantly made bad decisions (prohibition is one of the old ones, but that was a conservative law). It really does still give conservatism a bad track record when you look back on it. Also find the irony about quite enjoyable, particularly when Glen Beck was talking about how progressivism is evil, so apparently he still thinks all of those points you raised are evil not just the new ones. Buts thats Glen Beck, its his job to say crazy things.THAC0 said:socialism, and the fear of it by the upper classes, came to America in the 1850's or so and i think was brought mostly by German immigrants.drisky said:That seems a bit off, I just looked it up and socialism wasn't even conceived until 1834 and wasn't adopted by any countries until 1917, how can the people that were fighting against public education call something socialism when they don't even know what it is, never mind there ever having been a problem from in it (yes socialism was just getting started so it was relevant, but its a completely different context after solivet russia, people where still figuring out socialism so it was much less of a scare tactic).
that is the conservative talking point to be sure, but the reality is that the policies they support are by design, merely wealth distribution to the upper classes. Some people do actually believe the myth of "job creators" but the rest understand exactly what they are doing.drisky said:Then you get to the last three points and you kind off miss the point. The economic issue is that conservatives feel that every one has earned the money they have and shouldn't have to be penalized for being successful.
their definition though, is based on interpretations of the Bible. Hard to get more traditional than that.drisky said:The abortion comes from a different definition on life, not "traditional values".
Well, they "tend" to be against war. Your right, that does vary a lot from war to war. I, personally am against any and all aggressive war against countries that didn't attack us. That means that their has yet to be a war in my life that i supported. I would have no problem with defending the country however.drisky said:And war is a complicated issue that varies from war to war, winning your independence took a war so really the way you put it your first statement contradicts your last.
I would like to point out that the revolution was also motivated by the interests of some very wealthy people in the colonies and the average person most likely did not feel that oppressed by their tyrannical overlords. I included that on my list of "good" things just because i enjoy the irony of the same group that preaches nationalism, making up a very significant portion of the opposition to the revolution that founded the nation.
pleased to meet you.drisky said:Just so you know I am liberal on most issues, but you have to understand the opinions of your opposition, other wise your going to have a hard time arguing against them.
Oh silly me! I must remember to stop putting those subliminal messages in my posts that state my complete lack of autonomy.Riff Moonraker said:Are you serious? So, you mean to tell me you buy all the garbage that the OTHER media outlets spoon feed you? The problem that fox has, and that so many other people have with the union strikes is what it is costing the states. I'm sorry, but the media can blitz you all day long and tell you that the recession is over, but they are talking out of their backsides.k-ossuburb said:I find it ironic that the people that FOX would call "heroes" after 9/11 (firemen, police officers, etc.) are the same people they're antagonizing right now.
It's like FOX bases every one of its stories on emotional reactions and personal opinions instead of evidence and facts, and we know that's not the case. They're a news company after all. Herpa derp, derp, durrrr. FOX IS DA BESTEST COZ THEY SUPPORT JEEZUS AN' I LIKES JEEZUS! Durr.
Dethpixie said:Fact: 65% of people will take a clearly silly comment too seriously.Vredesbyrd67 said:Fact: 70% of Freud's theories are bullshit. Also, Saudi Arabia is a more sexually repressed country. So are most of the countries in southeast Asia. And not everything boils down to sexual tension. There's a myriad of factors.Dethpixie said:What's wrong with America?
I don't know why the fashion trends of modern female Saudis was brought up, but I think the problem was phrasing. If you were joking, it sounded either way too sincere or not absurd enough. Tone doesn't transfer well via text. Honest mistake. Jesus still loves you.
Sexual tension. Every problem can essentially be boiled down to it and you'll be hard pressed to find a more repressed country.
Okay, clearly people are taking me more seriously than I intended. I'm aware of the plight of women in the Middle East and of the sexual repression in Southeast Asia. I think what bugs me about America is the dichotomy between the sexuality of their media and the puritan nature of their culture/government, as well as how they've managed to make sex a commodity thanks to body sprays, designer clothes, etc.Nalesnik said:What about Saudi Arabia? Their entire women's fashion comprises solely of a full-body, black, shapeless cloak. o_oDethpixie said:snip
I don't want to get into an argument about this, but you're oversimplifying the sides.THAC0 said:Oh, this is an easy one.
Conservative.
And that extends to just about everything you mentioned in your poll. The problem isn't "the government", the government can be quite good and do amazing things. That is, unless conservatives have any say in it, and then it becomes a tool for corporations and the suppression of freedom.
just look at American history, I know your Canadian OP, so I will try to summarize it. All the cool stuff America has done has been the result of liberalism, often against conservative opposition.
--Won independence: liberals were for separating from England, conservatives were loyal to the crown.
--Civil War: liberals were willing to defend the union, conservatives were preaching about State's Rights.
--Public Education: Liberals wanted an educated populous, conservatives were yelling about socialism.
--Workers Rights: Liberals were wanting safe working conditions and a 40 hour week, Conservatives were still on it about socialism.
--Civil Right: Liberals wanted the races equal, conservatives wanted them separate.
--Women's Rights: Liberals wanted gender equality, conservatives were yelling about traditional values.
--Gay Rights: Liberals are all for it, conservatives are yelling about traditional values.
--Health Care: Liberals want it for everyone, conservatives are yelling about socialism (they never get tired of this one)
--Economy: Liberals want people to be able to afford to life, conservatives are all about keeping the rich rich and making them richer.
--Abortion: Liberals think women should have the right to their own reproductive organs, conservatives are back on traditional values.
--War: Liberals tend to be against it, conservatives AMERICUUUU FUCK YEAH!!! also we need to support military contractors.
Wrong. According to Dr. James Simons, founder of Renaissance Technologies and Math for America, our top 10% aren't as good as others' top 10%. So it's bad all around. Even in good universities, most of the students in grad school are Chinese and Indian. That should tell you something.Laurie Barnes said:Actually more than likely the group responsible for that is the US Government. The unions have little control over the system by which they are forced to educate. The real thing to blame for the system being a joke is "No-Child-Left-Behind", which blames teachers for when students get low scores. More often than not the kids get bad scores due to poverty, social instability, racial barriers, and sheer laziness.Zaik said:I'm really on the fence here. From my point of view, both sides seem wrong.
I would typically be 100% behind anyone willing to try to take down the teachers union in any capacity, they certainly do deserve it. However, paying teachers even less isn't really the right way to go about it.
I'm sure there's much better places the money could be taken from, but on the other hand the teachers union has turned the entire education system here into a pathetic joke up until college. I really can't say who I like less.
You pretty much summed it up in the poll. Unions and Government.Laurie Barnes said:Snip
You mean when Rep. Gabby Giffords got wounded? The dude wasn't a liberal or a conservative. He was a complete basket-case. Well, he was mentally ill, but I suppose in these times, it's possible to become that even if you weren't before. Considering he was a community college drop-out and banned from ever enlisting in the army, A) this should have raised some flags on the dude and B) considering how few prospects he must have had, is it really all that much of a stretch to think that he wouldn't crack? There are probably plenty more people his age out there with no hope of finding work that don't know what to do with themselves, and who's to say they won't succumb either?Kuilui said:Yes because Fox is the only news organization who does that. I recall when that one governor got killed by that lunatic every liberal news station was blaming Sarah Palin and glen beck and saying the shooter was a right wing nut job. Even though none of that was true. In fact the shooter was a liberal. All news organizations are guilty of doing this kind of nonsense so please don't make it sound like Fox is the only one guilty, okay?JordanXlord said:argeedk-ossuburb said:I find it ironic that the people that FOX would call "heroes" after 9/11 (firemen, police officers, etc.) are the same people they're antagonizing right now.
It's like FOX bases every one of its stories on emotional reactions and personal opinions instead of evidence and facts, and we know that's not the case. They're a news company after all. Herpa derp, derp, durrrr. FOX IS DA BESTEST COZ THEY SUPPORT JEEZUS AN' I LIKES JEEZUS! Durr.
and i think if jesus was watching fox news
He would Face palm and go
"I died for THIS?!"
Good! Glad we got that out of the way, then!k-ossuburb said:Oh silly me! I must remember to stop putting those subliminal messages in my posts that state my complete lack of autonomy.Riff Moonraker said:Are you serious? So, you mean to tell me you buy all the garbage that the OTHER media outlets spoon feed you? The problem that fox has, and that so many other people have with the union strikes is what it is costing the states. I'm sorry, but the media can blitz you all day long and tell you that the recession is over, but they are talking out of their backsides.k-ossuburb said:I find it ironic that the people that FOX would call "heroes" after 9/11 (firemen, police officers, etc.) are the same people they're antagonizing right now.
It's like FOX bases every one of its stories on emotional reactions and personal opinions instead of evidence and facts, and we know that's not the case. They're a news company after all. Herpa derp, derp, durrrr. FOX IS DA BESTEST COZ THEY SUPPORT JEEZUS AN' I LIKES JEEZUS! Durr.
Good thing only you picked up on it, if I had actually included any form of information alluding to my inability to make my own mind up about current events by cross-referencing sources and gaining as much as I can from both sides of the story in order to make an informed opinion of my own in actual text form (instead of the imaginary subliminal message form) then a whole manner of people would pick up on it.
Your psychic abilities astound me, have a cookie my dear fellow! It seems I am no match for your brilliant deductive skills which have allowed you to make an assumption about me without any evidence or even an obscure reference to the manner of which I interpret information. How you managed to get from my simple observations and sarcastic commentary on the misinformation spreading soap box of FOX News to being able to deduce that I automatically absorb and regurgitate everything I hear is a marvel in itself.
Good show, old boy!