Try this: Four men, four guns, all firing in close quarters at targets literally inches away from both your buddies and stuff (aka: people) you really don't want to hit. You have to be an absolute master shooter in order to pull that off.getoffmycloud said:Believe me firing a gun is far more difficult than it looks especially at longer ranges.SixWingedAsura said:I like swords. Sure, guns are better killers, but to truly master a sword, one must dedicated oneself to the blade and what wielding that blade entails. Any dumbass can pick up a gun and fire off a few rounds, but few know the intricacies of steel to steel combat. And I can respect that.
sawn shotguns sound terrifing, like they have saws on them or somethingFieldy409 said:yeah i usually carry around two sawn off shotguns, two 10mm pistols, a pair of machetes and a grenade.
i have to wear a big coat though to conceal them.
UK Huh? Well i suppose a shit load of damage if you went for their eye or throat, but generally just bleeding and soft tissue damage, but i doubt you'll get any vital organs with a 3 inch bladevxicepickxv said:Anybody know how much damage a man can do with a 3" knife?
Ah, yes. I was worried that google maps might have distortion issues at different latitudes, which was why I used the Canadian rather than US locations. I didn't think it'd be that big, though. I couldn't really use anything 54 degrees south, as there isn't a right lot of land there. I shall remove the error and leave my post West-of-Baghdad-and-North-of-Marrakesh-centric.thaluikhain said:Hey? NSW is about 3.5 times the size of the UK, which is about the same size as Victoria.Shoqiyqa said:Considering we're a bit smaller than Manitoba or Alberta, about the same as Queensland and New South Wales together, and have a population going on 70 million,
I know the feeling. Until a year ago it was illegal to possess any non-lethal method of self defense besides a pocket knife. Last year they finally legalized mace. Still no taser or anything else. Ironically it is legal to have and carry a handgun with a permit here (New York State) but even with said permit, I cannot legally own a taser.lacktheknack said:I want the local laws to rearrange so that I can carry a can of Mace. Or a taser.
Currently, I'm left with my hands, feet and teeth, and a nice long jail sentence because damn you if you try to defend yourself. Makes me feel all safe when I walk home at night.
What orbit? If they're in geostationary or any conventional geosynchronous orbit you can only hit places you could usefully mount a satellite TV dish, so not the shady side of anything tall and solid, and even then you're going to get lag as the system aligns plus dispersion making it less effective and more of an AoE weapon as you get further from the equator. If you go with the fast-moving polar orbits like photint satellites, you can hit anywhere on Earth from within 15 degrees of vertical within the next {timeframe} and the more satellites you have up there the sooner it'll be but there's still up to {timeframe} delay so it's more of an alternative to an LGB airstrike than an immediate tactical action. If you go with the highly elliptical orbits you get a lot more time-on-target thanks to the long trip out to the apogee and back, but you have to shoot from a greater distance too.Canned Spam said:I don't have weapons, I don't need any and they're heavily restricted. If I did somehow get into a situation where I need one I'd have to pick orbital lasers. I'd probably get caught in the blast, but it'd be damn awesome.
They're a support weapon, not an infantry weapon. Think of them in the role of the 115mm light gun or 81mm mortar at the least, not that of the rifle or smg, and probably more likely in the 155mm howitzer role considering how expensive satellites and satellite launches are.A standard GPS receiver for civil use offers an accuracy down to a few meters. In praxis the number and geometry of the received satellites influences the accuracy considerably, and in daily use, accuracies of about 20 m can be expected. More sophisticated GPS receivers as they can be found for land survey cost several thousand dollars and achieve an accuracy of a few centimetres. [http://www.kowoma.de/en/gps/accuracy.htm]
If that's all you want to do with it, seriously compare ammunition prices before you choose a calibre. You can get a lot more plinking for your $100 in .22LR than you can in .357 Mag.Custard_Angel said:One day I'd like to get a license for a .357 magnum. I don't really believe a gun is necessary for protection or anything like that, and I'd never dream of using it on a person (or even threatening them), but I'd like to have one to take to a range or a farm or somewhere and shoot stuff.
Saved someone from doing that once. She then rested her left thumb tip against the side of the slide instead of across the back of it, which wasn't comfortable but didn't cause injury. Then she took my advice about putting it against her right middle finger.TFielding said:If an M9 Beretta gets into the hand of an inexperienced user, there is a good chance that they could slice part of their thumb off.
'Nuff said.tjcross said:a sword is practical as long as you have space to use it.
i never said that a sword would beat a gun and in fact said that a gun is more effective however what i am saying is that a sword is a lethal weapon and has a practical use in essence it is a long knife you claim it to be useless because a more powerful tool exists which means you missed the point so allow to to tell it as simply as possible because you obviously can't understand normal english. SWORD SHARP SWORD HURT WHEN GET HIT BY IT.Custard_Angel said:'Nuff said.tjcross said:a sword is practical as long as you have space to use it.
Besides... Consider 2 scenarios where someone is approaching another person with the intent to kill.
In one scenario the person is carrying a broadsword. In the other scenario the person has a magnum in his pocket.
Who stands the greatest chance of successfully killing the other person?
Also, a sword is only defensive against melee weapons. Guns are offensive in all situations.
Also, a sword requires extensive training to be useful. A gun can be used by anyone without any formal training.
There is something... Broken about a situation where a casual gunman could successfully kill a grandmaster swordsman, when an amateur swordsman could not do the same to an expert gunman.
TL;DR - You're living in a fantasy world. There's a reason swords aren't used in combat anymore.