What? No I;m being polite, I always Salute Veterans of gaming, people who played games that I enjoy before I was even born. (I was born in 1990)Swny Nerdgasm said:Thanks I guess lol... wait... are you being facetious?Tenkage said:Wow a real Veteran, alright everyone, lets give him around of virtual Applause *Claps*Swny Nerdgasm said:I've been playing either a paladin or Cleric since 1989 in D&D so any game I play that has either of those two choices, thats where I gravitate towards
Well then thanks againTenkage said:What? No I;m being polite, I always Salute Veterans of gaming, people who played games that I enjoy before I was even born. (I was born in 1990)Swny Nerdgasm said:Thanks I guess lol... wait... are you being facetious?Tenkage said:Wow a real Veteran, alright everyone, lets give him around of virtual Applause *Claps*Swny Nerdgasm said:I've been playing either a paladin or Cleric since 1989 in D&D so any game I play that has either of those two choices, thats where I gravitate towards
No I find a Bard to be useful, but only if the party has three or more characters, below that and they won't work.Zyxx said:In D&D-based games, I'll often play a Bard (despite their almost invariable suckiness) since it's closest to my actual esoteric skillset (and level of suckiness.)
Sorcerer if I want to play a class that actually gets some love. And I'll take levels of Dragon Disciple when I can - because if I really could, I really would.
In other settings, I will always, always, always pick something magical (at least the first time 'round), and preferably dragon-related.
*falls over dead...then comes back up but with his wallet now missing, and his magical items now gone (LOL)*JLML said:Now you see me, now you.. DIE! *appears behind you and sticks a knife in your back*